Updated, 1:24 p.m. Tuesday:
Inside EPA has added this link which allows non-subscribers to read the story.
Interesting news out today from Inside EPA (subscription required), which is reporting that DuPont Co. is leading a new push by industry to weaken a water pollution limit on the toxic chemical PFOA and other perfluorinated chemicals.
Officials from DuPont, 3M and other PFC companies met behind closed doors last month with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to make their pitch. According to the story, by reporter Maria Hegstad, the industry proposal could weaken drinking water limits on PFOA — taking them from the 0.4 parts per billion contained in an EPA health advisory to 1.3 parts per billion in a formal drinking water standard.
The story says:
Industry scientists are urging EPA’s water office to alter its method for assessing the risks posed by perfluorinated chemicals (PFCs) when the office sets drinking water cleanup standards for widespread persistent pollutants — a move that would result in weaker limits than provisional EPA standards and even stricter New Jersey standards set when EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson was the state’s environmental commissioner.
PFOA is another name for ammonium perfluorooctanoate, also known as C8. DuPont Co. has used the chemical since the 1950s at its Washington Works plant south of Parkersburg. C8 is a processing agent used to make Teflon and other nonstick products, oil-resistant paper packaging and stain-resistant textiles.
Around the world, researchers are finding that people have PFOA and other PFCs, in their blood at low levels. Evidence is mounting about the chemical’s dangerous effects, but regulators have yet to set a binding federal limit for emissions or human exposure.
In September, the Obama administration EPA listed PFOA and another PFC, PFOS, among the chemicals it might set new water quality limits on. And that same month, PFCs were among the chemicals EPA said it would “Existing Chemical Action Plans” for under a project to reform regulation of toxic chemicals in the U.S.
According to the Inside EPA report:
Scientists from DuPont and 3M as well as representatives of Japanese manufacturers Asahi Glass and Daikin Industries met with the [EPA] Office of Water staff Oct. 15-16 where they urged the agency to use serum blood levels to set risk-based drinking water standards rather than the traditional approach of using external dose animal testing when setting safe exposure limits.
It goes on:
In one presentation to the office, 3M scientists John Butenhoff and Larry Zobel, DuPont toxicologist Robert Rickard and consultant Harvey Clewell argued that exposure to the chemicals does not result in harm — “No causal associations have been observed” between human exposure and adverse health effects, according to one presentation — and urged EPA to base its risk assessment on blood serum concentrations.
The industry scientists’ slides also argue that occupational exposure data shows there are no harmful effects below 5,000 ppb in human blood.
The story adds:
But a critic of the approach says that very few people have levels of PFOA or PFOS in their blood above 5,000 ppb, making it unlikely that a drinking water standard based on this risk level would be protective. And an Environmental Working Group (EWG) source calls the 5,000 ppb number “really high,” especially considering that population levels of PFOA are at 3-4 ppb, and that’s where health effects are already reported — this is [a] pretty amazing claim.”
The Inside EPA story noted the recent release by the C8 Science Panel of data showing increased cholesterol levels in Parkersburg, W.Va.-area children with an average PFOA level of 69 ppb in their blood.
But, the story didn’t mention a more recent major scientific paper that connected increased cholesterol to PFOA in the blood at levels — an average of 3.8 parts per billion — similar to those found in the general U.S. population.
Subscribe to Sustained Outrage
DuPont toxicologist, Robert Rickard “argued that the exposure to the chemicals [PFOA et al] does not result in harm.”
What kind of disingenuous, legalistic double-talk is that? It’s remarkable how Mr. Rickard and his secretive DuPont bosses can so readily ignore a growing body of science that says exactly the opposite.
Looking at only the most recent independently done medical studies:
* Danish medical study demonstrates a linkage between PFOA exposure and lower sperm counts in otherwise healthy young men.
* Another study shows an association between PFOA and infertility in women.
* Close to home, West Virginia University scientists find an association between PFOA and (a) serum lipids, elevated cholesterol levels, LDL, and (b) immune system changes in women and girls.
Undsoweiter. To say or imply this likely human carcinogen, PFOA or C8, is perfectly SAFE, poses “no risk”, is “harmless” with “no human health effects” is misleading and disinforming, if not arguably deceitful, in the opinion of the undersigned individual American citizen…funfundvierzig..
This was reported by National Academy of Sciences’ report for Congress, 1993: “Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride”, page 129:
“The are two general forms of fluoride in human plasma. the ionic form is the one of interest in dentisty, medicine, and public health. The other form consists of several fat-soluble organic fluorocompounds. These can be contaminants derived from food processing and packaging. Perfluorooctanoic acid (octanoic acid fully substituted with fluoride) has been identified as one of the fluorocompounds (Guy, 1979). The biological fate and importance of the organic fluorocompounds remains largely unknown. The extent to which the fluorine in these compounds is exchangeable with the ionic fluoride pool has not been determined. ”
Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride
Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride (1993) Commission on Life Sciences (CLS) … The National Academy of Sciences is a private, non-profit, …
http://www.nap.edu/books/030904975X/html/R1.html – 36k – Cached – Similar pages -
National Academy Press – Health Effects of Ingested Fluoride
Most important: 11 men lost their lives when the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded on April 20. This is a tribute by Steve Joynt to the 11 men who died on the Deepwater Horizon, “Oil spill Day 100: The 11 men who died on the Deepwater Horizon” We can never lose sight of the human cost of BP’s and others’ malfeasance.