<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Legal experts&#8221; weigh in on U.S. Supreme Court&#8217;s Benjamin ruling</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/</link>
	<description>Just another Blogs.cnpapers.com Blogs weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 16:33:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rod</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-2273</link>
		<dc:creator>Rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 15:47:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/#comment-2273</guid>
		<description>Thoughtful analysis, Andrew.  One thing that might be worth clarifying, however, is that the U.S. Supreme Court did not base its decision on the existing West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct.  It relied on pre-existing federal due process law under the Fourteenth Amendment, and made an incremental step further.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thoughtful analysis, Andrew.  One thing that might be worth clarifying, however, is that the U.S. Supreme Court did not base its decision on the existing West Virginia Code of Judicial Conduct.  It relied on pre-existing federal due process law under the Fourteenth Amendment, and made an incremental step further.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Today&#8217;s Must Read &#171; FIFTH COLUMN</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/comment-page-1/#comment-2272</link>
		<dc:creator>Today&#8217;s Must Read &#171; FIFTH COLUMN</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 05:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wvgazette.com/watchdog/2009/06/09/legal-experts-weigh-in-on-scotus-benjamin-ruling/#comment-2272</guid>
		<description>[...] Must&#160;Read By Hippie Killer  Everyone needs to read Clevenger&#8217;s suburb piece from the Gazette&#8217;s Sustained Outrage blog, for not one, but 2 reasons. First, for his spot-on analysis of a very important point that has [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Must&nbsp;Read By Hippie Killer  Everyone needs to read Clevenger&#8217;s suburb piece from the Gazette&#8217;s Sustained Outrage blog, for not one, but 2 reasons. First, for his spot-on analysis of a very important point that has [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

