Archive for the ‘Shooting Sports’ Category

Shooting sports OK for kids to see, after all

Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Well, how about that? London’s city fathers have decided that kids won’t be ruined by watching elite marksmen at work!

As I outlined in Sunday’s column, the people behind the city’s Ticketshare program — an effort to provide Olympic tickets to young people — didn’t originally plan to distribute tickets for shooting-sports events. Some unnamed someone apparently had deemed it “inappropriate” for young eyes to see world-class athletes using firearms in a safe and appropriate manner.

Now, after catching heat, those Terribly Concerned city fathers have changed their minds. Good.

More on the reversal in The Telegraph.

City fathers: London kids can’t watch Olympic shooting

Sunday, August 28, 2011

This week’s column is a bit of a rant — a rant against the politically correct but misguided effort to deprive 125,000 youngsters from London the opportunity to watch shooting sports at next year’s Summer Olympics:

That high-pitched whistle you hear is steam shooting from my ears.
Just when I thought the anti-gun crowd couldn’t get any more absurd, the organizers of an effort to provide kids with tickets to next year’s London Summer Olympics went and proved me wrong.
London’s mayor, Boris Johnson, wants to make up to 125,000 tickets available so young Londoners can share in the Olympic experience. The giveaway will extend to every Olympic sport – except shooting.
Reporters for the London Evening Standard quoted an unnamed administration source as saying, “We decided it would not be appropriate. It’s the only sport children will not be able to go to as part of the Ticketshare scheme.”
So, let me get this straight. Internationally sanctioned rifle, pistol or shotgun competitions are “not appropriate” for young eyes to see?
Oh, that’s right. Heaven forbid that they should watch people shoot at inanimate targets; better they should watch some shoot-’em-up crime drama on the BBC.
Heaven forbid that they should see people handling firearms in a safe and responsible manner; better they should learn the finer points of gun brandishing from some rapper’s cop-killa video.
Heaven forbid that they should watch athletes exercising the sort of transcendent skills that come only from countless hours of disciplined practice; better they should gain inspiration from the brick-throwing slackers who instigated the Tottenham riots.
I suppose the Brits’ paranoia toward firearms shouldn’t bother me, but it does. After all, there are people in the United States who would like nothing better than to do away with private gun ownership, and the London Ticketshare shenanigans will almost certainly be tried here as soon as an opportunity arises.
When you’ve lived as long as I have, certain things stick with you.
In 1984, while attending a football game at Mountaineer Field, I watched and cheered as West Virginia University rifle coach Ed Etzel was given an SUV for winning a gold medal in the 50-meter prone rifle event during that year’s Los Angeles Olympics.
Political correctness, though present in other areas, hadn’t yet been used to tamp down Americans’ enthusiasm for firearms. University officials at the time were more than happy to reward Etzel for his skill with a rifle.
I wonder if today they’d extend that same appreciation toward current rifle coach Jon Hammond, a world-class shooter with 2012 Olympic potential. They might, but frankly I doubt they would. Their attitudes toward firearms became achingly apparent in 2003, when they eliminated the school’s rifle team and only reinstated it under extreme pressure from the state Legislature.
The Educated Elite’s attitudes toward guns didn’t change overnight, but rather were shaped by a constant media drumbeat of anti-firearm reporting. Examples are legion, but the one that stands out most in my mind came during the 1996 Atlanta Olympics.
NBC provided the broadcast for those Games. Rather than televising any of the shooting events – which admittedly aren’t terribly exciting to watch – network moguls sent veteran commentator Dick Enberg to the shooting venues to do a pre-packaged “wraparound” segment for one evening’s broadcast.
Long story short, it was a hit piece. Instead of focusing on the extreme discipline, muscle control and hand-eye coordination successful shooters must have, Enberg focused on the shooting events’ lack of apparent physical activity.
The “kicker,” or close, of Enberg’s piece showed precisely how he felt about the shooting sports. With stentorian eloquence, he declared that most of the Games’ sports embody the Olympic motto, “Faster, higher, stronger,” but then added that for shooting sports, it should be, “Slower, lower … weaker.”
And now the London thing. Grrrrrrrrr …

If she could practice, she’d be lethal

Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Catherine Kauffelt

Catherine Kauffelt is a freak of nature.

She shows up at national rifle competitions, often with precious little practice, and shoots very, very well.

Case in point: At the recent National Prone Rifle Championships in Camp Perry, Ohio, Kauffelt — a Charleston native studying at the University of California — shot some pretty sporty scores.

In the Dewar Course Metallic Sight match, she captured runner-up honors with a score of 400 (out of 400 possible) with 35 x-ring shots. She also took High Woman and High Collegiate honors in the match.

She then shot another 400 (with 29 x-ring shots) to win the High Expert Civilian Category in the 100-yard Metallic Sight Match. In the next match — the 50-meter Metallic Sight competition — she shot a 397 with 26 x-rings to take second in the Expert Civilian Category.

Her three-match 1,197 aggregate on the competition’s second day earned her top honors in the Expert Civilian Category, one point ahead of runner-up Ben Haney. Her four-day total was good for a second-place overall finish in the category.

For the third year in a row, Kauffelt was selected to represent the U.S. in the Randle Cup Match, a “postal” match in which elite shooters from several countries shoot in their own countries and compare scores with one another. Kauffelt acquitted herself brilliantly there, too. She posted one of three 400 scores put up by the 10-woman U.S. squad.

Her coach, Bill Shank of the Putnam County Junior Smallbore Club, believes Kauffelt would be even more of a world-beater if she only had time to practice. Her environmental economics/pre-law curriculum leaves precious little time for anything else, though, so she shoots only when she comes home for breaks.

Shooting ranges are getting shot up

Sunday, July 31, 2011

Too popular?

This week’s column explores the down side to operating shooting ranges on public property. West Virginia operates 27 of them, and lately has been fighting a losing battle with littering and vandalism:

West Virginia’s shooting ranges have become victims of their own success.
Maintained by the Division of Natural Resources at 27 state-run wildlife management areas and state forests, the ranges attract throngs of hunters and recreational shooters.
Ordinarily that would be a good thing. But lately, people seem to be abusing the ranges instead of using them.
“There’s been a major change in the way people act at the ranges,” DNR director Frank Jezioro told me.
“The ranges were originally built so hunters could go and sight in their rifles, to try out new equipment, and to teach young people to shoot. Now the ranges’ primary users are recreational shooters, many of whom are not hunters.
“An average hunter uses a range one or two times a year, and probably doesn’t shoot more than 25 rounds per visit. Recreational shooters are coming one to two times a week and are shooting dozens or even hundreds of rounds per visit.”
Even that wouldn’t be a problem, Jezioro added, were it not for the targets those high-volume shooters have been choosing.
“They’re bringing in a lot of military-style firearms, from AR-15s to .50-caliber rifles, and they don’t seem content to shoot paper targets with them,” he said. “They’re shooting at old TVs and computer monitors. They’re shooting at milk jugs, glass bottles and tin cans. They’re even bringing in watermelons to shoot, like they see on TV.”
What’s worse, some shooters are even taking aim at the DNR-provided steel frames that hold paper targets.
“I don’t know if it’s to see if their bullets can pierce metal, or if it’s just to hear the clang of the bullet hitting something. The bottom line is that they’re literally cutting the frames down,” Jezioro said.
The job of fixing the damage and cleaning up the litter usually falls to DNR wildlife managers.
“Those people should be spending their time planting wildlife plots, or mowing fields to provide better wildlife habitat,” Jezioro said. “Instead, they’re spending way too much time cleaning up and repairing ranges.”
The problem came to a head a couple of weeks ago at a range near Morgantown.
“One of our employees encountered a guy who had brought a sack of beer bottles and was planning to set them up as targets. The range was littered with shot-up propane bottles, bowling pins and electronic equipment. It looked like a landfill,” Jezioro said.
Similarly irresponsible behavior caused the range to be closed at Berkeley County’s Sleepy Creek Wildlife Management Area.
“Two years ago, people started putting targets on top of the earthen bank that serves as a backstop for the targets,” Jezioro explained. “Shots were going over the backstop and were hitting people’s houses. We couldn’t allow that to happen.”
The good news is that DNR officials aren’t taking the abuse lying down.
“We’ve instructed our people to clean up the ranges and to rebuild them, and we’re appealing to the shooting public to abide by the rules,” Jezioro said. “From now on, if we catch people shooting stuff up and leaving it, we’ll cite them for littering.”
He has simple advice for shooters who wish to avoid those $500 tickets.
“Clean up after yourselves,” he said. “Anything you bring in – paper targets, ammo boxes, beverage containers – you take out with you. Pick up your shotgun hulls and spent brass. Treat the place as if it were your own property, because really it is.”

Winfield shooter wins high sub-junior at Nationals

Tuesday, July 26, 2011

Congratulations to young Noah Barker of Winfield, who has captured High Sub-Junior honors in the 50-meter Metallic Sight Match at the National Prone Rifle Championships at Camp Perry, Ohio.  Barker, who shoots locally for the Putnam County Gun Club Junior Smallbore Team, fired a 394 (of a possible 400) with 22 x-ring shots on his way to the win.

Barker also acquitted himself well in the 10o-yard Metallic Sight Match. He finished 3rd in the Sub-Junior category with a score of 393 and 18 x-ring shots. His three-match aggregate score of 1184 (out of a possible 1200) ranked second in the category, just one point behind winner Sammy Richardson of Helena, Ala.

One of Barker’s teammates, Catherine Kauffelt of Charleston, placed fourth in the Expert Civilian category in the 50m Metallic Sight Match. Kauffelt fired a 398 with 22 x-ring shots.

The competition isn’t over yet. I’ll update as the results become available.

Clarksburg shooter takes national honors

Monday, July 18, 2011

Bryan Layfield

The honors just keep rolling in for Clarksburg’s Bryan Layfield.

The 20-year-old was crowned Collegiate Champion and Junior Champion in the National Pistol Championships held July 12-16 at Camp Perry, Ohi0.

Layfield fired an aggregate 2,565 of a possible 2,700 in three required matches and finished nine points ahead of runner-up Joseph Totts of Magadore, Ohio.

Along the way, Layfield fired an 854 to capture High Collegiate and High Junior honors in the .22-caliber championship, and followed that with an 856 to claim similar honors in the center-fire championship. Totts narrowly edged Layfield out for the .45-caliber championship, 858-855.

Layfield has dominated the junior pistol rankings since he started competing in 2008. He currently holds a Master rating in pistol from the National Rifle Association.

Skeet ace turns lead into Olympic gold

Saturday, June 18, 2011

Kim Rhode (AP photo)

How do you get to the 2012 London Olympics? Same way as you get to Carnegie Hall — practice, practice, practice.

That’s the credo of four-time Olympian and defending world skeet champ Kim Rhode. The Associated Press recently did a fascinating feature on her, and here it is:

NEWHALL, Calif. (AP) — Kim Rhode slips two shells into her 12-gauge shotgun, yells “Pull!” and takes dead-aim on the first target, then a second one whizzing through the air. She hits both cleanly, leaving orange clouds of chalk hanging in the cool air.
She reloads and does it repeatedly, with father and coach Richard Rhode pushing the buttons that remotely launch the targets on the skeet field named for the four-time Olympic medalist.
Rhode has already become the first U.S. athlete nominated to the team for next year’s London Olympics. But she’s not taking it easy while others train, wait and worry about making the Summer Games.
“I choose to shoot every day because I want to push myself through the highs and the lows that come with anything,” she said during a break at Oaktree Gun Club off Interstate 5 north of Los Angeles.
“It’s a lot of hard work and drilling and repetition. That mental side of the game really plays in. There’s so many little things that go into it.”
Training means shooting 500 to 1,000 rounds per day, usually seven days a week.
Rhode spends a lot of money on lead going for more gold. She goes through four cases of shells at $100 a box and $300 worth of targets, costing her about $700 every day of training. Her custom-made, 9-pound Italian shotgun is worth about $20,000.
The 31-year-old from El Monte, Calif., has sponsors who help pay for her training and travel to competitions. She earns money through endorsements, coaching, giving speeches and signing autographs.
The longest break from training she’s taken was a two-week honeymoon to the South Pacific two years ago after marrying Mike Harryman, who works in heating and air conditioning.
Rhode (pronounced Roady) got into the sport as a youngster accompanying her parents to the shooting range. Her mother, Sharon, was shooting when she was eight months pregnant with her only daughter.
“Some people bowl, we went and shot skeet,” Richard said. “It was very obvious at a very young age that she had the capability of shooting really good scores.”
Rhode first competed in skeet as a 10-year-old.
“It’s something that I really gravitated towards because of the challenge,” she said, noting she’s 5-foot-4. “It’s one of the few games that doesn’t matter how big or how small you are, you really are on an equal playing field. Everybody is equal when you step out on that line.”
Her father added, “It’s not strength. It’s eye-hand coordination, the ability to slow everything down and shoot.”
Rhode won her first Olympic medal in double trap at the 1996 Atlanta Games, becoming at 17 the youngest female shooting champion in the games’ history. She added a bronze medal in 2000 and another gold in 2004.
After women’s double trap was dropped from the Olympics, Rhode changed to skeet and won a silver at the 2008 Beijing Games. She proudly shows visitors her medals and the well-worn ribbons they hang on.
In London, Rhode has a chance to become the first American athlete to medal in five consecutive Olympics in an individual sport.
“Definitely, I don’t think London will be my last (Olympics), I don’t think 2016 will be my last,” she said. “If I can continue to perform at that level, then you’ll definitely see me. It’s something you can do for years and years.”
At the same time, the down-to-earth defending world skeet champion with the long ponytail, French manicure and diamond stud earrings is realistic.
“There are some really fantastic shooters, especially some of the people that I’m coaching and training, they very easily could overtake me at any point,” she said.
Rhode has overcome her shotgun being stolen after the Beijing Olympics (she got it back), an injury to her shoulder in a skiing accident, and most recently, surgery to remove a 2-inch cyst in her breast that was non-cancerous.
Her shoulder area is still sore, so she has yet to return to full strength as she prepares for a competition in Colorado Springs, Colo., that will decide the team for the Pan American Games this fall.
When Rhode isn’t training, she’s studying to finish three more classes to earn a college degree in food marketing and agribusiness, collecting rare children’s books and antiques, and tending to her classic car collection that includes a Cobra she built from a kit.
If prodded, Rhode will show off some of her Annie Oakley-like skills, including tossing a dime in the air and shooting it to smithereens.
“I love this with a passion,” she said. “I do it for a lot of fun, but at the same time it’s just a game.”

$75k grant could help states recruit new hunters

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Virginia wildlife officials got a boost today in the form of a $75,000 grant from the National Shooting Sports Foundation. Its purpose? to try to determine why apprentice hunters decide to purchase licenses for the first time. The results could eventually help state wildlife agencies recruit more hunters.

From the PR Newswire:

NEWTOWN, Conn., May 24, 2011 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ — The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries has been awarded a grant for $75,000 from the National Shooting Sports Foundation to expand opportunities for hunters.
The state is one of nine to receive funding from NSSF through its Hunting Heritage Partnership program. NSSF, the trade association for the firearms, ammunition, hunting and shooting-sports industry, has provided more than $4.3 million in grants to 38 state agencies over the past nine years to support programs that promote hunting and target shooting.
The agency will take the lead on a multi-state research project that will determine the motivations of apprentice-hunting license holders for obtaining a first-time license; their expectations related to hunting; and their satisfaction with their hunting experiences. Research from Virginia, Alabama, Kentucky, Georgia and South Carolina will be part of the project. Such information can be used by state agencies to help encourage apprentice license holders to become active hunters.
“The apprentice hunting license is a great tool to recruit new hunters, and Virginia is very pleased to have the opportunity to enhance the value of this popular program,” said Bob Duncan, executive director of VDGIF. “We look forward to working with our partner states and Mark Duda with Responsive Management to focus on the challenges of removing barriers to hunting and identifying ways to secure the future of our rich hunting heritage.”
Responsive Management is a Harrisonburg-based outdoor recreation research firm.
NSSF developed the Hunting Heritage Partnership grant program to assist state agencies nationwide in their attempts to help hunters locate land on which to hunt and easily access state hunting information plus encourage newcomers to start and then continue hunting.
“NSSF grants to state agencies are making a difference,” said Chris Dolnack, senior vice president and chief marketing officer of NSSF. “Programs are being launched to benefit hunting and target shooting that otherwise might never have gotten off the ground in these challenging economic times.”
The grant program is helping NSSF fulfill its goal of increasing participation in hunting and target shooting by 20 percent by 2014.

Ban on lead ammo and fishing tackle isn’t dead yet

Friday, November 26, 2010

I suppose it was inevitable.

The coalition of environmental activists has resumed its quest to seek a ban on lead ammunition and lead fishing tackle.

The activists couldn’t get Congress to act, so they petitioned the U.S. Environmental Protection agency to enact the ban through administrative regulations. EPA officials read the law — which specifically exempts ammunition from any such bans — and denied the petition. Now the activists are back at it. They’re suing, hoping to find a friendly court to do what lawmakers and administrators refused to do.

The story is here, in the Press of Atlantic City.

EPA ponders ban on lead ammunition; Update: EPA abruptly rejects lead-ban petition

Friday, August 27, 2010

Scares about government gun bans are often just that — mere scares.

But a recent petition made to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has the potential to become much more than a scare. It wouldn’t do away with guns, but it’d do away with a lot of ammunition.

Environmental advocacy groups have petitioned EPA chief Lisa Jackson to ban the use of lead bullets, lead shot and lead fishing sinkers on the grounds that the continued use of lead violates the 1976  Toxic Substance Control Act.

The petition (available for review in PDF format at the EPA website) argues that lead shot and lead bullet fragments routinely poison scavengers, songbirds, predatory birds, waterfowl and some mammals. It cites valid scientific studies and makes a pretty fair case for the EPA to mandate non-toxic ammunition.

But to grant the petition and enact a lead ban, the EPA would literally have to ignore the very law the petitioners cite as the rationale for the ban. When Congress passed the Toxic Substance Control Act back in 1976, they specifically exempted lead ammunition.

No problem, say the petitioners. They argue, in essence, that the law refers to cartridges and shells, and not specifically to bullets or shot. They further argue that since bullets and shot are sold individually as ammunition components, they therefore fall under the Toxic Substance Control Act and can be banned by EPA regulation.

It is a sign of the times, I suppose, when perfectly clear legal language can be parsed into something completely contradictory to its original intent.

The EPA has until Nov. 1 to rule on the petition.

Update: Late today, with more than two months left in the petition’s comment period, EPA officials abruptly and unexpectedly rejected the petition. Story is here, from U.S. News and World Report.