Archive for the ‘Hunting’ Category

Manchin to feds: Leave hunting, fishing alone!

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Former West Virginia governor and current U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin has put the National Park Service on notice.

In a letter to NPS director Jon Jarvis, Manchin asked that federal officials put in writing that the proposed High Allegheny National Park and Preserve continue to allow hunting and trapping within its boundaries. Manchin also demanded that stockings of non-native rainbow and brown trout be allowed to continue, that small timber cuts be allowed to create wildlife clearings, and that the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources remain the agency primarily responsible for fish and wildlife management on park grounds.

Manchin said in the letter he was less than pleased with answers he’d received from Park Service officials when he started asking questions about those issues. He added that he would pull his support for the park if his and his constituents’ hunting-, fishing- and trapping-related requests weren’t met.

The text of the letter can be found here.

Hat tip: Chris Lawrence at West Virginia MetroNews.

 

 

Jon Jarvis

$300,000 for a hunting license?

Monday, February 6, 2012

Yep. That’s how much a New York man paid for a single Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep tag in Montana. And get this — the amount he paid was not even a record. From the Associated Press:

GREAT FALLS, Mont. (AP) — A New York man has paid $300,000 for a license to hunt bighorn sheep in Montana this fall.
The Great Falls Tribune reports that the special auction license was bought last month by James Hens of East Bern, N.Y., at the Wild Sheep Foundation convention in Reno, Nev.
With the license, Hens will be able to take a bighorn in any Montana sheep hunting district this fall.
The Fish, Wildlife and Parks commission authorizes several groups to auction big-game tags. The groups get 10 percent of the money and the rest goes to FWP for research and habitat improvement for the species.
The most ever paid for a bighorn sheep tag was $310,000 in 1994.

The guys who attend the Foundation for North American Wild Sheep conventions tend to be wealthy. But you probably figured that out from the AP story.

Hunter needs rabies shots after killing rabid deer

Friday, February 3, 2012

For the second day in a row, I’m posting a rabies story. This one’s a little unusual, though. It involves a hunter and a rabid deer. Here’s the release from the Pennsylvania Game Commission:

HARRISBURG – Pennsylvania Game Commission officials today announced that a Lancaster County hunter has undergone post-exposure rabies shots after harvesting and field dressing a deer on Jan. 20, in Valley Township, Chester County, that ultimately tested positive for rabies.
“The hunter contacted us about his concerns that the deer was unfit for human consumption,” said John Veylupek, Game Commission Wildlife Conservation Officer (WCO).  “The hunter said that he saw the deer standing in a creek, straining and growling.  He thought there was a coyote nearby from the sounds the deer was making.
“After gathering information from the hunter, as well as samples for testing, it was determined that the deer was rabid. Because the hunter had scratches on his hands and had field dressed the deer without wearing gloves, we considered this a human exposure and urged him to contact his doctor about post-exposure rabies shots.”
Dr. Walter Cottrell, Game Commission wildlife veterinarian, reiterated the agency’s long-standing recommendations that hunters and trappers avoid harvesting animals that appear sick and to wear rubber or latex gloves when field dressing any mammal.
“All mammals are susceptible to rabies and can spread the virus in the right circumstances,” Dr. Cottrell said. “To prevent the spread of wildlife diseases, we encourage hunters and trappers to contact the Game Commission about any animals that they encounter that may appear to be sick.  Also, when field dressing any mammal, it is critical to wear rubber or latex gloves to prevent exposure to not just rabies, but also to other disease organisms.”

Hat tip: J.R. Absher at The Outdoor Pressroom.

Celebs don’t have to wait for Iowa deer tags

Tuesday, January 24, 2012

In Iowa, some deer hunters are more equal than others. If you’re Ted Nugent or Bo Jackson or Toby Keith, you pay a hefty premium and get to skip the usual three-year wait for a non-resident deer tag. From the Associated Press:

DES MOINES, Iowa (AP) — Some question whether Iowa needs to continue giving celebrities easy access to deer hunting in the state, but it appears unlikely that the promotional program will be scrapped.
The state program gives 75 celebrities, such as rocker Ted Nugent and former professional athlete Bo Jackson, an opportunity to buy a special out-of-state deer hunting permit each year. Other nonresidents might wait years to buy a similar permit.
The celebrity program began in 1998 to help promote the state as a top hunting destination.
Iowa Bowhunters Association President Randy Taylor tells the Des Moines Register that he’s not sure the state really needs the promotion anymore.
“There is no deer hunter nationwide who doesn’t consider Iowa one of the trophy hot spots in the nation,” Taylor said.
Iowa routinely receives thousands more requests than can be filled each year from out-of-state hunters. So the program isn’t popular with the people who sometimes wait years for one of about 6,000 nonresident permits to harvest deer of any sex.
A state committee ranks celebrity applications on a point system. The applicants most likely to win a hunting tag are the ones the state believes will garner the most media exposure for Iowa.
The celebrities pay the same $551 fee that other nonresidents pay for the hunting tag. Iowa residents pay $89 for theirs.
A few of the special celebrity tags are given to nonprofit conservation groups that often auction them off to nonresidents. Those auctions can raise $6,000 to $10,000, and the proceeds are split with the state.
Steve Dermand, who helps oversee the program for Iowa’s Department of Natural Resources, says he’s heard the complaints, but he doesn’t think anyone is ready to eliminate the program.
“When this started, Iowa was just becoming recognized as having a good deer resource. This came along during that growth time,” Dermand said. “Now, Iowa is high-enough profile, the state is in all the hunting magazines and where to go for whitetail.”
State Sen. Dick Dearden of Des Moines, chairman of the Senate natural resources committee, said he doubts the program will be eliminated. He also doesn’t expect a change in the number of general out-of-state tags.
So it’s likely that celebrities like country singers Toby Keith, Aaron Tippin and Miranda Lambert will continue to get access to deer hunting in Iowa along with professional hunters like Mark Luster.

Deer-kill statistics are sometimes deceiving

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

John McCoy photo

The old expression, “The grass is always greener on the other side of the fence,” was probably written to describe deer hunters.

No matter where hunters are from, they always seem to believe they’d have better success if they hunted somewhere else.

Case in point: Ask West Virginians if they’d rather hunt deer in the Mountain State or in Missouri, and they’d probably choose Missouri. But would they really have it any better in the Show-Me State? Let’s take a look at the harvest totals from both states’ recently concluded whitetail seasons.

According to the Missouri Department of Conservation, Show-Me State hunters killed about 239,000 deer. According to the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources, Mountain State hunters killed slightly more than 133,000 deer. Advantage to Missouri, right?

Not necessarily.

Missouri’s land area is 69,704 square miles. Divide 239,000 by 69,704 square miles and you get a productivity average of 3.43 deer killed per square mile.

West Virginia’s land area is 24,229 square miles. Divide 24,229 by 133,000 and you get a productivity average of 5.49 deer per square mile.

Advantage West Virginia.

The devil in all this ciphering, is in the details. If statistics are available, it would be interesting to see which state produces more trophy bucks. Conventional wisdom would say Missouri. But West Virginia’s four bowhunting-only  counties account for about 75 Pope and Young Club bucks each year. That’s a slew of trophies.

The arguments could go back and forth forever, but the bottom line is this. Chances are many hunters in Missouri would jump at the chance to hunt in West Virginia, and vice versa. The grass is always greener….

Should hunting rifles be silenced?

Friday, January 13, 2012

Proponents believe silencers (or, more properly, suppressors) are a good idea because they’ll prevent the sound of hunters’ shots from disturbing nearby landowners.

I’m sure deer poachers everywhere are salivating at the thought.

If suppressors became legal in West Virginia, trophy bucks in the state’s four bowhunting-only counties would live live hard. The sound of gunshots, particularly at night, is one of the few ways law enforcement officers have of detecting poachers in those rugged, largely rural counties.

As far as I know, no one has yet proposed changing West Virginia’s law. But lawmakers in Kansas, Louisiana and Washington have already approved suppressors, and the Georgia Legislature just took up the issue. From the Associated Press:

ATLANTA (AP) — A Georgia Senate proposal would end the ban on silencers for hunting firearms.
Senate Bill 301 is sponsored by Sen. John Bulloch, who says allowing hunters to use silencers would keep them from disturbing their neighbors. The Ochlocknee Republican says hunters would still have to have a federal permit to possess a silencer and argues this does not create an unfair advantage for hunters.
“As our growth patterns have changed and we’re having more and more residential properties infringing on hunting properties,” Bulloch said. “If you have a silencer on your hunting gun, the noise would not disturb neighbors as bad. This doesn’t really have anything to do with fair chase. It’s about trying to be respectful to people in residential areas.”
The bill has been assigned to the Senate Natural Resources Committee, which Bulloch co-chairs. Sen. Ross Tolleson, a Republican from Perry who is one of the bill’s co-sponsors, is the committee’s chairman.
Bulloch said the legislation was brought to him by the National Rifle Association. Reached by telephone, NRA spokeswoman Stephanie Samford said the organization does support the use of silencers, which she referred to as suppressors.
“There are several benefits to hunting with suppressed firearms,” Samford said. “Suppressors decrease the gunfire noise, which is important because a lot of hunters don’t always wear hearing protection. Suppressors also reduce recoil and muzzle rise. That allows the shooter to get into position for a follow up shot much more quickly and accurately.”
Samford said that silencers do not allow hunters to sneak up on animals because a sound is still emitted.
The NRA successfully pushed for similar legislation last year in Kansas, Louisiana and Washington, and supports legalizing silencers in all 50 states. Silencers are legal to possess and use for lawful purposes in most states, but require a federal permit from the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives. The permit costs $200.

Hunting deer with spears

Tuesday, January 10, 2012

Atlatl technique

Well, technically what they’re doing in Missouri is hunting deer with “darts,” which is what atlatl enthusiasts call the 4-foot-long feathered spears they fling from primitive throwing sticks, very much like the ones Ice Age hunters used to take down mastodons.

A Missouri man recently became the first modern atlatl-wielding hunter to kill a deer in the Show Me State. Luke Boenker, 54, of Maryland Heights, Mo., took a four-point buck on the first day of the state’s recent firearm season for bucks. A few hours later, Scott Rorebeck of Trenton, Mo., bagged another one.

The Evansville (Ind.) Courier and Press has the full story. Fascinating stuff.

I can personally attest to the velocity at which an atlatl can fling a spear. While working on a feature story on atlatl enthusiasts a few years back, one offered me a chance to attempt a distance throw. I had a bad right shoulder at the time, and could only use my wrist and forearm to flick the dart downrange. It went 80 yards.

Hat tip: J.R. Absher at the Outdoor Pressroom.

Bear kill sparks controversy

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Controversial in Georgia

When I first saw the following Associated Press story, I was surprised that people in Georgia were getting up in arms about a bear season that killed only 34 bears.

The more I read, though, the more apparent it became that the story has subplots and undertones that didn’t show up in the first couple of paragraphs. Interesting stuff.

From AP:

MACON, Ga. (AP) — About a tenth of the Middle Georgia black bear population was killed when the first-ever open bear season was held in three Middle Georgia counties last month. Although some wildlife advocates are raising concerns about harm to the bear population, state officials say the hunt will be held the same way next year.
A population of about 300 bears, centered in Houston and Twiggs counties, was a key driver behind Georgia’s $29 million purchase of 10,000 acres of the Oaky Woods Wildlife Management area in Houston County a year ago. But as both bear and human populations grow, the state Department of Natural Resources has fielded an increasing number of complaints about nuisance bears from residents of Houston and Bibb counties.
For more than a decade, hunters competed for permits to participate in a quota bear hunt at the Ocmulgee Wildlife Management Area in Twiggs and Bleckley counties. In recent years, that hunt was moved from December to November, when bears are more active. On average, one bear was shot there every three years, said Bobby Bond, a senior wildlife biologist and specialist on Middle Georgia’s bears for the DNR.
But this year, after a public comment period, the state settled on a one-day open season on private lands in Bibb, Houston and Twiggs counties.
Thirty-four bears were killed Nov. 12, half of them females, and all in an area near Tarversville in Twiggs County, Bond said.
“We killed too many bears, especially females,” said John Trussell, an outdoor writer and founder of Save Oaky Woods. “There were too many hunters in that area, and there was a lot of baiting going on in that area. … We shouldn’t have a bunch of folks crowding into one small spot and shooting every bear that walks across.”
Trussell, a longtime hunter, contends that the state should switch to a quota system and perhaps shift the hunt back to December to protect more female bears.
“It’s taken us 100 years to get where we’re at,” he said. “It’s better to start slow.”
Six bears were killed at a single hunt club. Other hunt clubs had three and two bears harvested, Bond said.
“Anytime you get six bears on one property, that’s a lot,” DNR ranger Cpl. Robert Stillwell said.
Bond said the most bears ever harvested in one day at the Ocmulgee WMA quota hunts was two. He said the only time he has ever heard of bears congregating is around food sources, such as in fields where peanuts are being harvested.
Hunting bears over bait is a misdemeanor “of a high and aggravated nature.” DNR rangers issued six citations related to two bears killed by hunters who were using bait, Stillwell said.
He said the illegally shot bears included the largest bear killed that day, a 436-pound male, and a 250-pound male. Rangers caught hunters in the act on two different leased properties.
Each citation for hunting bears over bait can involve fines of up to $1,500 plus restitution of up to $1,500, but the penalty will be up to a judge in Twiggs County Probate Court, Stillwell said.
He said next year there will be more rangers patrolling the hunt, which attracted as many as 40 or 50 hunters to hunt clubs with a few thousand acres. Some landowners charged $300 or $400 for one-day hunting rights on their land, he said.
Stillwell said hunting bear over bait is harder to prove without a tip, now that Georgia has legalized hunting deer over bait. He said a hunter can claim that the bait was intended for deer, even if it’s dog food with honey poured over it.
“If we find a place (like that), then we’d know to go back there and check,” he said. “But in some instances, you have to wait for a bear to be killed to get them. That bothers me. My job is to protect the bears. … So it’s harder with having the baiting laws legalized, for sure.”
Bond said hunters in Twiggs County have been clamoring for a bear hunt there for years, and in a recent opinion survey most participants favored hunting them. Comments to DNR were overwhelmingly positive when the open season hunt was proposed, said John Bowers, DNR’s assistant chief for game management.
The hunt was also intended to cut down on conflicts between bears and humans in Houston and Bibb counties — where no bears were actually killed.
“We were getting to the point where we were getting more and more bear complaints and more showing up where they shouldn’t be and getting habituated to humans,” Bond said. “We thought (the hunt) would help increase their fear of humans.”
Bond expressed surprise that so many bears were killed in such a small area and that none were killed in Houston County — although one was shot there that wasn’t recovered, he said.
“As long as you don’t go over 10 percent of your population (harvested by hunters), you’re OK,” Bond said. “But for Twiggs County, it might be kind of concerning to lose 17 females.”
“That’s an awful lot of bears to be killing out of one place,” Stillwell said. “It’s not as if we have thousands and thousands of bears like we do deer.”
Trussell argues that if the rules aren’t changed, “the harvest is going to increase next year, probably by a harmful amount.”
He thinks Georgia should follow the example of South Carolina, which allowed its first bear hunt in three coastal counties this month. According to The State newspaper in Columbia, a quota system was used to permit just 30 hunters to have a shot at the population of 500 or so bears over the course of several weeks.
Georgia’s hunting seasons and rules are determined on a two-year cycle and won’t change before next year’s hunt Nov. 10, Bowers said.
“We’re pleased with the harvest that was achieved,” he said. “It fell right in line with what we anticipated. The number of females was a little higher than we would like, but is not of great concern to us.”
Bowers said the bears’ core habitat on the wildlife management acted as a preserve, since it wasn’t hunted.
But a large portion of the land that was once part of that preserve has fallen into private hands, and in many cases is leased for hunting, Trussell pointed out. About 7,000 acres each of the Ocmulgee and Oaky Woods wildlife management areas has gone into private hands since 1994.
Trussell said the 7,000 acres of Oaky Woods that Georgia stopped leasing this fall is being advertised for hunting leases now, and he expects far more hunters — many from out of state — to be taking aim at bears next November.
Bowers said the DNR will consider the rules again only after it has two years of data.
That data is likely to be enhanced by a new bear survey being conducted by the University of Georgia with funding from DNR and the Georgia Department of Transportation, which will be widening Ga. 96 in the heart of the bears’ territory. Underpasses for the bears are built into the highway plans, and officials want to gather information on bear movement patterns to pick the best spots, Bond said.
He said bears will be caught and radio collared, as they were in several previous studies. (Two of the bears killed last month were part of the most recent study.) Wildlife officials hope to learn more about the bear population size, reproductive habits and den sites, Bond said
Bowers said that study is starting now and will conclude in 2014.

Bullet that killed hunter hit grizzly first

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Ah, the marvels of DNA analysis. In this case, it gave investigators a definitive picture of what happened during a September incident that ended with a Nevada man dead of a gunshot wound suffered while he was being attacked by a wounded grizzly bear.

From the Associated Press:

LIBBY, Mont. (AP) — Officials in northwestern Montana say a shot fired at a grizzly bear as it attacked a Nevada hunter passed through the bear before striking and killing the hunter.
The Western News reported Wednesday that tests requested by the Department of the Interior found grizzly bear DNA on the .30.06 bullet that killed 39-year-old Steve Stevenson, of Winnemucca, Nev., on Sept. 16.
Stevenson and 20-year-old Ty Bell, also of Winnemucca, were hunting near the Montana-Idaho border when Bell shot what he thought was a black bear.
The men tracked the bear into heavy cover, where the 400-pound animal attacked Stevenson. Bell fired several shots trying to kill the bear.
Lincoln County Sheriff Roby Bowe called the shooting a “horribly tragic accident.”
“It started off with a single misjudgment and ended up in a horrific act that will affect families for a very long time,” he said, adding that he doesn’t expect charges will be filed. That decision will be up to the county attorney.
It is illegal to kill grizzly bears in the lower 48 states, where the animals are protected under the Endangered Species Act. Grizzlies were largely exterminated across the lower 48 last century, but their population has rebounded dramatically in recent decades.
The bear shot by Bell was one of about 45 of the animals that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service estimates live in the Cabinet-Yaak Ecosystem Area in northwest Montana and northern Idaho.
The area the men were hunting in is a grizzly bear recovery zone.

Want to play on public hunting land? Pay toll!

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

For decades, public lands paid for by hunting- and fishing-license money have been open for everyone’s use, free of charge.

Virginia state officials are changing that. Owners of hunting and fishing licenses will still get in free, but other folks will have to pay. From the Associated Press:

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries will begin charging a limited $4 fee at its wildlife management areas and public fishing lakes starting Jan. 1.
The access fee will apply to visitors who do not possess a valid hunting, freshwater fishing or trapping license or a current state boat registration.
The department owns more than 201,000 acres and 35 public fishing lakes statewide. Most of the land and lakes were purchased primarily through revenue generated by those licenses. Those license-holders also support the upkeep of department-maintained roads, parking areas, kiosks and the management of those properties.
The access fee will be required for bird watchers, horseback riders and others outdoor lovers over 17 who use the department’s holdings.
The annual access permit will be $23.

Interesting. Unless I miss my guess, Virginia’s action will start a trend.