Archive for the ‘Fishing’ Category

Manchin to feds: Leave hunting, fishing alone!

Wednesday, February 8, 2012

Former West Virginia governor and current U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin has put the National Park Service on notice.

In a letter to NPS director Jon Jarvis, Manchin asked that federal officials put in writing that the proposed High Allegheny National Park and Preserve continue to allow hunting and trapping within its boundaries. Manchin also demanded that stockings of non-native rainbow and brown trout be allowed to continue, that small timber cuts be allowed to create wildlife clearings, and that the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources remain the agency primarily responsible for fish and wildlife management on park grounds.

Manchin said in the letter he was less than pleased with answers he’d received from Park Service officials when he started asking questions about those issues. He added that he would pull his support for the park if his and his constituents’ hunting-, fishing- and trapping-related requests weren’t met.

The text of the letter can be found here.

Hat tip: Chris Lawrence at West Virginia MetroNews.

 

 

Jon Jarvis

Carp, the other white meat

Friday, January 20, 2012

Common carp (Texas Parks & Wildlife photo)

For more than 120 years, carp introduced by well-intentioned state agencies have gone virtually unmolested in United States waters. Maybe that’s about to change. From the Associated Press:

WABASHA, Minn. (AP) — An Australian company that processes carp will open its first U.S. facility in Wabasha Friday.
Carp may not be popular on menus in the U.S., but it’s widely eaten in Eastern Europe and Asia. Keith Bell of K & C Fisheries says in China, the carp is steamed with vegetables for the main meal. In Poland, Bell says the fish is canned with vegetables or is baked for Christmas dinner.
Bell and his wife, Cate, began exploring the upper Mississippi River as a place to grow their business after several years of drought in Australia made it difficult to harvest carp there.
Minnesota Public Radio News reports the common carp is native to Europe and Asia and was introduced in the Midwest as a game fish in the 1880s.

434,000 trout — wasted

Friday, December 23, 2011

I understand why the trout had to be destroyed, but I mourn the loss of so much angling potential. From the Associated Press:

MONTPELIER, Vt. (AP) — The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service is disposing of 434,000 lake trout from a Bethel fish hatchery because of fears that stocking them in the Great Lakes could spread the invasive algae known as “rock snot.”
Officials tried to find alternative locations where the 4-inch fingerlings could be stocked into waters already contaminated with the algae, known more formally as didymo, including lakes in Vermont and New Hampshire, but none could be found, said Fish and Wildlife spokeswoman Terri Edwards.
“Everyone at the hatchery is upset. This is not the choice that we wanted to make,” she said. “We did not want to take the risk of introducing didymo into any environment.”
The decision to destroy the fish was made by the Fish and Wildlife Service’s Northeast regional director, Wendi Weber, who determined they could not be safely stocked in lakes Erie and Ontario — where they were supposed to be released — without posing a risk that didymo could be transported to those bodies of water.
Federal official asked counterparts in states across the Northeast and around the Great Lakes for a lake that had already been contaminated with didymo where the fish could be released.
“In the end, we were not able to place them,” Edwards said.
The fish are being taken out of their tanks and dumped into deep pits where they are covered with lime and buried. They pose no public health threat, Edwards said.
Didymo is believed to be transported by anglers moving from one body of water to another. It poses no threat to humans but can overwhelm cold water lakes and streams, threatening aquatic insect and fish populations by smothering food sources.
The hatchery is located on the banks of the White River, which is known to contain didymo, and was inundated by contaminated river water during flooding in August caused by Tropical Storm Irene.
Last month, about 3,000 larger Atlantic salmon breeding stock from the hatchery were cleaned and donated to several Native American tribes. Some tribes used them as part of religious rituals.
Once the lake trout have been removed from the hatchery, the tanks will be scrubbed and disinfected to be sure no threat of didymo remains. The water in the hatchery’s tanks comes from wells.
The fish originally were raised to be stocked in lakes Ontario and Erie next year. While the fish will be missed, over time their absence isn’t expected to hold back the stocking programs for the Great Lakes, Edwards said.
In 2011, the Fish and Wildlife Service stocked more than 4 million lake trout in the Great Lakes.
It’s unclear how long the Bethel hatchery will be out of service or what its role will be once repairs have been completed. In addition to disinfecting the tanks, other repairs from Irene damage are also being carried out.
The loss of the Bethel hatchery comes as the Allegheny National Fish Hatchery in Warren, Pa., goes online after being out of service for several years. The Warren hatchery, originally established to produce rainbow, brook and brown trout for northwestern Pennsylvania streams, now is intended to produce lake trout for restoration in lake Erie and Ontario.

Want to play on public hunting land? Pay toll!

Wednesday, December 21, 2011

For decades, public lands paid for by hunting- and fishing-license money have been open for everyone’s use, free of charge.

Virginia state officials are changing that. Owners of hunting and fishing licenses will still get in free, but other folks will have to pay. From the Associated Press:

RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — The Virginia Department of Game and Inland Fisheries will begin charging a limited $4 fee at its wildlife management areas and public fishing lakes starting Jan. 1.
The access fee will apply to visitors who do not possess a valid hunting, freshwater fishing or trapping license or a current state boat registration.
The department owns more than 201,000 acres and 35 public fishing lakes statewide. Most of the land and lakes were purchased primarily through revenue generated by those licenses. Those license-holders also support the upkeep of department-maintained roads, parking areas, kiosks and the management of those properties.
The access fee will be required for bird watchers, horseback riders and others outdoor lovers over 17 who use the department’s holdings.
The annual access permit will be $23.

Interesting. Unless I miss my guess, Virginia’s action will start a trend.

Some answers on that national park issue

Sunday, December 11, 2011

For this week’s Gazette-Mail column, I went to Judy Rodd, the principal source for the push to create a national park and preserve in West Virginia’s northeastern highlands. Judy was able to answer some of the existing questions, but not all. Here’s the column.

Last week, when news broke that much of West Virginia’s northern Allegheny Highlands might be considered for national park and preserve status, sportsmen raised a ton of questions:
How big would the park be? Would hunting be outlawed? Would trout stockings be curtailed? Who would manage the fish and wildlife? And what would become of trapping, ramp digging and ginseng hunting?
We have answers now for at least some of those questions. Earlier this week, I spoke with Judy Rodd, a spokeswoman for Friends of High Allegheny National Park and Preserve, who clarified some of the murkier points.
The preserve, as currently envisioned, would be pretty darned big – roughly 750,000 acres.
Rodd said it would start at Cathedral State Park in Preston County and extend southward to Cass in Pocahontas County. Its western boundary would start at Shavers Mountain near Elkins and would extend eastward to include current units of the George Washington National Forest in Hardy and Hampshire counties.
“All the lands that would be included in the preserve would be lands that are current state parks or are part of the Monongahela and George Washington national forests,” Rodd explained. “No private lands would need to be purchased.”
She added that only a portion of the land would be considered a full-fledged national park.
“The main units of the national park portion would include Cathedral, Blackwater Falls and Canaan Valley state parks, and some portion of the Spruce Knob-Seneca Rocks National Recreation Area,” she said.
“The Park Service folks have said units of the park could be spread apart like that. The rest of the land in the Allegheny Highlands – the vast majority of the land under consideration – would be in preserve status, where hunting and fishing would be encouraged.”
Rodd said she wasn’t sure if the Park Service would allow trapping on the preserve. However, a subsequent Internet search of several preserves’ websites showed that trapping is allowed on most of them.
The question of ginseng hunting caught Rodd by surprise; she said she “would have to talk the Park Service about that.” As to ramp digging, she harbored a rather strong opinion: “I dig them too, so naturally I would want [that] to be allowed.”
One of the more ticklish questions surrounding the preserve concept would be whether the state Division of Natural Resources or the National Park Service would have primary control of fishing-related issues.
In the New River Gorge National River, for example, DNR officials manage fisheries as they see fit. One sticking point has arisen, though. Park Service officials several years ago asked that non-native fish – rainbow and brown trout, specifically – not be stocked within the park’s boundaries. Stockings continue to this day.
In the state’s mountain highlands, trout fishing is a big issue. Most of the state’s most popular stocked-trout streams and rivers are in the preserve area, and most of the fish stocked are rainbows and browns. Rodd said she didn’t know whether DNR or Park Service policies would prevail.
“That’s too technical an issue for me,” she said.
Rodd said provisions to address any or all of sportsmen’s concerns could be written into legislation that would establish the park.
“That’s a long way off, though,” she said. “The [upcoming] study is called a reconnaissance study. If it finds that the area is unique enough to be included in the national park system, a resource study would follow. And then there would be a period of time to write the legislation and get it passed. Park and preserve status is still years away.”

An update on that national park announcement

Thursday, December 1, 2011

Oh my.

It appears one of my humble blog posts touched a nerve, and a rather sensitive one at that.

In Wednesday’s post, I detailed how national park designation for West Virginia’s northern Allegheny Highlands might cause the area to be closed to hunting, and might affect trout stockings too. Within hours, Judy Rodd, the source quoted in Paul Nyden’s original Gazette story about the potential park, posted a reply to the blog, which read as follows:

Hunting would be allowed in the proposed High Allegheny Park and Preserve and in fact would be encouraged. Fishing would also be a main attraction. — Judy Rodd, Friends of High Allegheny National Park.

Not long after that, I received a phone call from Marni Goldberg, press secretary for U.S. Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va.

Ms. Goldberg explained that Sen. Manchin would never support legislation that might curb hunting in West Virginia’s mountain highlands or anywhere else. She said Manchin was willing to consider the area as a preserve, but not as a full-fledged national park.  She offered to e-mail me a formal statement from the senator, which read as follows:

“Senator Manchin is a lifelong hunting enthusiast and is committed to making sure that the Alleghany Highlands remain open to hunting if the area receives a new designation from the National Parks Service.”

So apparently the idea is to create in northeastern West Virginia something akin to the New River Gorge National River in the south — an area administered by the National Park Service, but not a full-fledged no-hunting national park.

I find it intriguing that Rodd’s reply to the blog post referred to the proposed area as “High Allegheny Park and Preserve,” while her signature line affiliated her with an entity called “Friends of High Allegheny National Park.” Did the word “preserve” only recently get added to the name, and if so, why?

I also find it intriguing that the original Gazette story sent shock waves through the West Virginia Division of Natural Resources. My sources there say interoffice e-mails were flying fast and furious.  Apparently they didn’t get the “hunting will be allowed” memo, either.

I might be wrong, but my reading of the tea leaves is that proponents of the “High Allegheny Park and Preserve” didn’t adequately address the question of hunting in their early public-relations efforts, or possibly they failed to gauge the backlash that would result from a push for a full-fledged national park.

According to the National Park Service’s own website, a “preserve” designation is possible for lands where hunting is important to the local populace. Hunting is allowed on reserves. The Denali and the Wrangell-St. Elias parks in Alaska are examples, as is the Big Cypress Reserve in Florida.

The website also says that when lands receive the full “National Park” designation, hunting is not allowed.

The Park Service’s study of the High Allegheny National Park and Preserve issue will begin soon. My guess is that the issues of hunting and fishing will be adequately addressed.

 

National park could halt hunting in W.Va. highlands

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Tuesday’s article by Gazette colleague Paul Nyden focuses on a soon-to-begin  National Park Service study to determine whether sizable chunks of West Virginia’s Randolph, Tucker, Pendleton and Pocahontas counties should be designated a national park.

While park status would certainly add another layer of environmental protection for what are currently U.S. Forest Service lands and designated federal wilderness areas, it could put an end to deer and turkey hunting in a part of the state where people pursue hunting with an almost religious fervor.

Read Paul’s story to get an idea of the scope of the proposed park:

CHARLESTON, W.Va. — Next month, the National Park Service will begin conducting a survey to determine if some areas within the Monongahela National Forest should be made into a national park – something West Virginia doesn’t currently have.
Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., requested the survey, which is scheduled to be completed by September 2012.
On Monday, Manchin said he “is pleased that the National Park Service is undertaking this survey to evaluate whether this beautiful part of our state should be designated as a national park.”
In a recent news release, the NPS said the survey would “determine whether the historic, natural and recreational resources in the project area are ‘likely’ or ‘unlikely’ to meet Congressionally-required criteria for a national park.
Judy Rodd, executive director of the group Friends of Blackwater Canyon, said the proposed High Allegheny National Park would be formed from “lands in the northern area of the Monongahela National Forest, which is already federal land,” as well as Blackwater Falls and Canaan Valley state parks.
“It would not cost anything,” Rodd said.
The new park would offer visitors a unique ecology, the chance to see a wide variety of beautiful and rare birds, as well as historical battlefields and forts from the Civil War era, Rodd said. Lands in the proposed park would also include those improved during the Great Depression, under projects run by the Works Progress Administration and Civilian Conservation Corps.
The proposed new national park would include lands east of Elkins, north to the towns of Thomas and Davis, east to Petersburg, and south to Seneca Rocks and Franklin.
The park could also include well-known sites such as Spruce Knob, Seneca Rocks, Blackwater Falls, the Otter Creek Wilderness, Canaan Valley National Wildlife Refuge and Dolly Sods.
The headwaters of the Potomac, Monongahela and Greenbrier rivers would all be within the park. Recreational activities available to visitors could include hiking, biking, kayaking, skiing, horseback riding, rock climbing and spelunking.
Last year, T. Destry Jarvis, president of Outdoor Recreation and Park Services LLC, prepared a report given to Manchin that stated, “The High Allegheny Plateau, currently a portion of the Monongahela National Forest, is the best preserved and least ‘developed’ region of the state.
“The High Allegheny Plateau offers outstanding scenery, composed of nationally significant natural features and cultural sites, abundant wildlife and rare species of plants and animals — as well as the hospitable, well-cared-for communities that offer the service amenities needed by the recreational visitors [and] tourists,” Jarvis wrote.
“This would help put West Virginia on the map as a place to visit. It would be an economic engine for the highlands,” said Rodd.

We’re talking about a big chunk of land here. I’m sure I’m a little off here and there, but it appears to me that the park would start in Randolph County somewhere east of Elkins — possibly in the vicinity of Shavers Mountain  — and extend eastward into Pendleton County’s Seneca Rocks – Spruce Knob area. From its northern terminus at Thomas in Tucker County, it would extend southward through the Blackwater Canyon and Canaan Valley all the way to Durbin in northern Pocahontas County.

If the area becomes a true national park, managed under the rules established in parks such as Yellowstone, Yosemite, Glacier, Great Smoky Mountains and others, most of West Virginia’s northern Allegheny Highlands (minus private in-holdings, of course) would become a no-hunting zone overnight.

Of course, lawmakers being lawmakers,  it’s always possible for them to create a special rule that would keep the lands open to hunting. When members of Congress voted to designate the New River Gorge area as a National River, they did just that.

Equally worrisome to sportsmen should be the National Park Service’s attitude toward trout stockings. In Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Park Service officials are attempting to eradicate rainbow and brown trout from streams where native brook trout can live. It’s not difficult to imagine a scenario whereby trout stockings might be prohibited for the Blackwater River, the North Fork of the South Branch, Seneca Creek, Gandy Creek, Dry Fork, Glady Fork, Shavers Fork and the East and West forks of the Greenbrier.

Stay tuned. This could get interesting…

 

Angler eats potential record fish

Sunday, November 6, 2011

Kurt Price and his dinner

Kurt Price will never be able to savor the sweet taste of having his name immortalized a book of fishing records.

He’ll have to settle for the flavor of sea bass.

The 25-year-old Welshman devoured his chances of making the record book when he fileted and ate the rather large sea bass he’d caught from the lquay at Tenby, Wales. The record for shore-caught sea bass is 19 pounds, 11 ounces. After examining the photo of Price holding his catch, authorities believe Price’s fish would have eclipsed the record.

The full story is here, in the London Daily Mail.

Price’s sad tale reminds me of the time when I visited West Virginia’s Division of Natural Resources headquarters to interview a DNR official. The official’s secretary was all a-twitter because she was preparing to call a Marmet man who had caught a 10-pound paddlefish — a real rarity back in those days. She planned to ask the man to pose with his catch for a photo in Wonderful West Virginia magazine.

When the man answered, she launched into her spiel: “Hello, this is Alpha Gerwig of the state Division of Natural Resources. We understand you caught a paddefish, and we’d like to take a picture of you and the fish for our magazine.”

(Pause, followed by wide-eyed astonishment)

“You…….ATE……it?”

Yep, he sure did. Just like Kurt Price.

 

Salmon returning to namesake river

Tuesday, November 1, 2011

Anglers net a good-sized Chinook salmon from the Salmon River (AP photo)

The Salmon River in upstate New York has had salmon for years, but they weren’t the right kind.

The Lake Ontario tributary used to harbor fine runs of Atlantic salmon, but those disappeared during the late 1800s. Now the river is better known for runs of hatchery-bred Pacific salmon species — Chinook and coho — and hatchery-bred brown trout and steelhead.

Now Atlantic salmon are coming back. The Associated Press has a terrific piece about the comeback:

PULASKI, N.Y. (AP) — Native Atlantic salmon are once again reproducing in the wild in central New York’s renowned Salmon River, where anglers travel from across North America and overseas every autumn to reel in hatchery-bred Atlantics as well as non-native chinooks, cohos, brown trout and feisty steelheads that swim upstream from Lake Ontario.
After more than a century without a wild-breeding population, this is the third year in a row that researchers from the U.S. Geological Survey have found young Atlantic salmon in the river, said USGS scientist Jim Johnson. When the young mature, eggs will be taken from some to propagate at the USGS research lab in Cortland, he said.
The goal is to re-establish a heritage species that had a prominent place in the cultural history of the region, where early settlers wrote of spearing hundreds of salmon a night during the spawning run.
“Our geneticist says any strain that survives to adulthood will be a preferential strain to use in the future,” Johnson said.
Lake Ontario once supported the world’s largest freshwater population of Atlantic salmon. But the fish vanished in the late 1800s as a result of overfishing and habitat destruction. Government agencies in the U.S. and Canada have maintained an Atlantic salmon fishery by the annual stocking of millions of hatchery fish, but the fish haven’t been able to reproduce in the wild because of a thiamine deficiency caused by eating alewives, an invasive species. Alewives contain an enzyme that destroys thiamine, also known as Vitamin B1.
“After Atlantic salmon and lake trout were extirpated, there was no longer a major predator to eat the alewives in Lake Ontario and the population exploded,” said Fran Verdoliva, Salmon River program coordinator for the state Department of Environmental Conservation.
Pacific salmon — chinook and coho — were brought in from hatcheries to control the alewife population in Lake Ontario in 1968, and brown and steelhead trout were added in the 1970s.
“The sport fishery developed out of what started as biological control of invasive species,” Verdoliva said.
On a typical fall weekend, you’ll find anglers lining the banks of the Salmon River almost shoulder to shoulder. The fish are so abundant that in shallow areas, it seems you could walk across their shining backs from one stony bank to the other.
Tens of thousands of mature fish that instinctively return to the state hatchery where they were born are stripped of sperm and eggs by hatchery workers to breed a new generation.
The workers toss the fish, which naturally die after spawning, into a garbage bin because of state Health Department limits on consumption by humans or animals. All fish from Lake Ontario are contaminated with low levels of toxic PCBs and the pesticide Mirex.
The health advisories don’t deter anglers from their annual pilgrimage to the Salmon River. Last year, an estimated 113,000 people fished the river, making it one of the most intensive fisheries in the United States, Verdoliva said. Many, including Verdoliva, release all the fish they catch, fishing only for sport.
“On the 18 miles of the Salmon River below the dam, the number of fishermen surpasses all other tributaries combined plus the boat fishery on the lake,” Verdoliva said.
“This is the only place in the Northeast where you can catch 25-inch king salmon in ankle-deep water,” said Phil Bortz, a fishing guide who has had clients from as far away as Oregon, Arizona and Switzerland. “Steelhead are the holy grail of the species. Pound for pound, they’re the toughest fighting fish out there. It’s like having a lightning bolt on the end of your line.”
Gail Sult, of Allentown, Pa., said she and her husband, Frank, fish in Canada, Pennsylvania, Tennessee and North Carolina, but the Salmon River is their favorite. “Here, the fish are much bigger, the scenery along the river is awesome, and people are very nice, down to earth.”
Atlantic salmon are a welcome addition to the Lake Ontario fishery not only because they’re native to the lake, but also because they run up the rivers earlier than the fall-spawning fish, thus extending the fishing season. They’re also prized by anglers because of their fighting spirit.
“The Atlantic is a better-fighting game fish than the chinook,” said tackle shop owner Malinda Barna, who would like to see the state reduce the number of chinooks stocked and concentrate more on coho, steelhead and Atlantic salmon.
It’s unclear why Atlantic salmon are now reproducing in the wild, but a decline in the number of alewives coupled with a rise in numbers of another invasive species called the round goby may have something to do with it.
“Gobies are high in thiamine,” Verdoliva said. When salmon eat gobies, it may increase their thiamine level, countering the ill-effect of alewives, he said.
The downside of the Salmon River’s huge fish population is that it draws some people who are less interested in sportfishing traditions than in bragging rights to a trophy fish — particularly during the fall chinook run, Barna said. She said many anglers still snag fish — the now-illegal practice of dragging hooks through the water to catch fish by the tail, gills, or other body parts. Many leave beer cans and other garbage along the riverbank and in the woods.
She wants to see more state enforcement of fishing regulations and stiffer fines for violators.

Seven survive by clinging to cooler and capsized boat

Tuesday, October 11, 2011

The capsized boat (Fla. Fish & Wildlife photo)

Sadly, one member of the eight-person fishing party apparently did not survive. From the Associated Press:

MARATHON, Fla. (AP) — Four hours into a family fishing trip, rough waves flipped a 22-foot boat off the Florida Keys, tossing eight people overboard. Seven of them, including a 4-year-old girl, survived by clinging to their capsized vessel and a small blue cooler for almost 20 hours, suffering exhaustion, jellyfish stings and hypothermia.
A 79-year-old woman, the matriarch of the group, was missing and presumed drowned.
“When the will to live kicks in, human beings can do amazing things,” Coast Guard Petty Officer Nick Ameen said. x
Those rescued were taken to a hospital with non-life-threatening injuries.
The family left Layton in the Middle Keys around 8 a.m. Saturday to fish in less-than-ideal conditions. It was raining, seas topped 7 feet and winds were whipping up to 38 mph. After they anchored 3½ miles off the island chain, two waves hit suddenly, capsizing the vessel.
The women grabbed the girl and the 2½-foot cooler. One of the men tried to rescue his mother, but she slipped through his grasp and disappeared into the water.
Almost immediately, the two groups — the three women and girl and three men — drifted apart.
Nearly a day later, they were rescued when a commercial fisherman spotted the men Sunday morning and alerted the Coast Guard, which found the women and the blue cooler several miles away in the warm waters.
The women said the boat turned over so quickly that there wasn’t time to grab life jackets for anyone except the child, said Kendra Graves, a seaman with the Coast Guard.
Florida law requires children 6 or under on a boat 26 feet or less to wear a life jacket if the boat is moving. If the craft is anchored or docked, they don’t have to wear a life vest.
As the weather improved Sunday, fishing boat captain David Jensen headed out with customers to catch live bait. Off in the distance, he saw a large object floating in the water.
As he turned the boat to get closer look, he saw a man waving. At first, he said, he thought there was only one person holding on to the sunken boat, its bow protruding just a few feet out of the water. When he got closer, he realized there were three men.
“I tried to get them to swim to the boat, but they said they didn’t know how to swim,” Jensen said. “Then I had the mate throw them life jackets. One guy put on the life jacket and swam to the boat. The other two guys wouldn’t get off the boat. … They said they didn’t know how to swim.”
One of Jensen’s customers jumped in and swam over. He tied the boats together, and helped the other two men, one at a time, back to Jensen’s boat.
“They were exhausted. One guy overnight had lost his mother,” Jensen said. “He was very visibly upset, which was a little tough because he was the one who spoke the best English.”
Zaida San Jurjo Gonzalez died. Her son, Jorge Alejo Gonzalez, survived along with his wife, Tomasa Torres, the elderly woman’s daughter, Elena G. Gonzalez, and her boyfriend, Juglar Riveras.
Also rescued were Jorge and Elena Gonzalez’s uncle, Jose Miguel De Armas, his wife, Yunisleidy Lima Tejada, and their 4-year-old daughter, Fabiana De Armas Lima. All are from South Florida. The other survivors’ ages ranged from 30 to 62.
After the men were found shortly before 9 a.m., the fishermen called the Coast Guard, who found the women. They men were hanging on to the floating cooler and started waving and yelling for help when they saw the Coast Guard boat.
All of the boaters were soon reunited, wrapped in blankets and treated for shock and hypothermia.
“They were all pretty happy to see each other,” Graves said.
It wasn’t clear if the boaters were aware of a small-craft advisory that had been posted early Saturday.
“They shouldn’t have been out there,” said Florida Fish and Wildlife spokesman Robert Dube, whose agency is investigating. “It was nasty from the get-go.”