
The poisoned elephant (AP photo)
It’s happened again — a second rare Sumatran elephant was recently found dead in Indonesia, apparently poisoned by villagers attempting to protect their crops.
From the Associated Press:
BANDA ACEH, Indonesia (AP) — An official says a second endangered Sumatran elephant has been poisoned in western Indonesia, apparently by villagers trying to protect their crops.
Forestry Ministry official Harmidi says the carcass of the 20-year-old male elephant was discovered Wednesday near a plantation in Aceh province.
Harmidi, who uses only one name, says a group of elephants had been wandering in the area in recent days, roaring and destroying crops.
An 18-year-old female died in Aceh after being poisoned in late April.
As forests disappear, elephants stray into inhabited areas in search of food.
Fewer than 3,000 Sumatran elephants are left in the wild and environmentalists warn that they could be extinct within three decades unless steps are taken to protect them.
Viewed through the lens of Western values, killing an elephant like this seems tragic and wasteful. While I don’t by any means condone the poisoning of elephants, I understand why people who lead hand-to-mouth existences feel they have no choice but to do it.
Look at the dateline on the AP piece — Banda Aceh, Indonesia. Sound familiar? Aceh province was the one most devastated by the Christmas 2004 tsunami that killed an estimated 167,000 people in Indonesia alone. Seven and a half years isn’t much time to recover from such a ruinous event, and I have no doubt that the villagers in Aceh are having a tough time of it. To them, a crop-eating elephant is a threat to their survival.
As I said before, I don’t condone the killing of elephants. In this case, though, I believe I understand it.