Archive for the ‘Black lung’ Category

MSHA moving ahead with unenforceable dust rule

Friday, January 20, 2012

Despite legislation that prohibits it from being enforced — at least until the GAO completes a report on the proposal — the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration has quietly announced plans to finalize its new rules aimed at ending black lung disease.

A new Labor Department regulatory schedule, posted on the Internet, but not publicly announced by the agency, lists a date for publication of the final rule as April 2012.  I asked MSHA spokeswoman Amy Louviere about it, and she said in an email:

The rider does not restrict MSHA’s ability to promulgate the rule, only MSHA’s ability to implement or enforce the rule.

House GOP tries to end effort to ‘End Black Lung’

Thursday, December 15, 2011

UPDATED: As we reported in Saturday’s Gazette-Mail, this little rider made it into the spending bill …

We’ve heard House Republicans talk quite a bit about how much they care about coal miners’ jobs … but what about those coal miners’ lives?

You have to wonder, when you see the GOP leadership sticking riders into appropriations bills like this one, described in a summary of a funding bill for the Department of Labor:

A prohibition on the implementation or enforcement of DOL’s “coal dust” rule until an independent assessment of the integrity of the data and methodology behind the rule is conducted.

That’s right, the majority party’s proposal for funding MSHA (see pages 35-36) would keep the agency from implementing the key provision of its campaign to End Black Lung, a deadly disease that claimed the lives of 10,000 coal miners in the last decade.

The GOP legislation would block MSHA from instituting a tougher coal-dust standard until the U.S. Government Accountability Office “evaluates the completeness of MSHA’s data collection and sampling, to include an analysis of whether such data supports current trends of the incidence of lung disease arising from occupational exposure to respirable coal mine dust across working underground coal miners.”

Never mind the peer-reviewed studies that show a resurgence of black lung in parts of the nation’s coalfields.  Never mind the data showing that miners working under what are currently legal levels of coal dust are developing black lung. And forget about the fact that public health and worker health experts have for years been urging MSHA to do exactly what agency chief Joe Main is trying to do — tighten the legal limit for coal dust.

I don’t know if there’s a war on coal, but you have to wonder if there’s really  a war on coal miners.

What about the war on coal miners?

Friday, November 4, 2011

We continue to hear an awful lot about the Obama administration’s supposed “war on coal,” with op-eds coming out now and again by various local business boosters, repeating the same rhetoric over and over.

What I keep wondering is when are any of these big defenders of coal miners going to start defending coal miners’ health and safety, and not just their right to have a job that threatens to put them into an early grave. Once again this week, it took a congressman from California to stand up in the House chamber and call for passage of mine safety reform legislation, and to question whether Alpha Natural Resources is headed on such issues.

It reminded me of a recent post from our friend Celeste Monforton over at The Pump Handle blog, about efforts in Congress to stop the Obama administration from trying to end black lung disease:

It’s too late for Ronald Martin of Dema, Kentucky. “I’m in last stage of black lung,” he wrote in shaky script, “please help the miners so they won’t suffer like I suffer. I can’t breathe but a little.” Mr. Martin sent his note to the Labor Department’s Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA) to comment on the agency’s proposed rule to reduce workers’ exposure to respirable coal mine dust—the dust that damaged his lungs so severely. Other coal miners also sent their comments to MSHA, urging the agency to put a more protective regulation in place as soon as possible to prevent younger miners from developing black lung disease.

The major US coal mining companies, in contrast, strongly object to MSHA’s proposed rule. In their written comments and public testimony they use all the stale, typical terms to criticize the rule, saying it’s flawed, counterproductive, arbitrary, and irrational. They tell MSHA to withdraw the proposal, but still insist they have miners’ interests in mind and are dedicated to providing safe working conditions.

Celeste singled out the industry’s supposed push for use of personal dust monitors:

The coal industry’s hypocrisy is especially apparent when it comes to the proposal’s provisions concerning a specially-designed continuous respirable dust monitor. This 6-pound device can be worn by a mine worker to provide him with a continuous readout of his cumulative average exposure to respirable coal dust. Development of the device dates back at least 30 years, and coal mine operators have insisted in nearly as many years that any new regulation had to incorporate this technology. That was their story and they were sticking with it.

But wait:

Now that the device is proven reliable, accurate and mine worthy—-and more than 270 have been sold commercially—-the mining industry is fighting MSHA’s plan to incorporate them in its regulation. Murray Energy’s Robert Murray said the devices are “unproven, unreliable, subject to tampering, and fail to protect miners.” Anthony Bumbico of Arch Coal raised a number of objections to the devices, called continuous personal dust monitors (CPDM), saying

“it is not ready to be deployed for compliance purposes. Nor is it ready for daily exposure to the rugged working conditions present in underground coal mines.”

Mr. Bumbico’s plan is really bold:

“…to work together to develop the next generation of the CPDM.”

Read the whole post here.

 

Labor Department wins Byrd black lung rule case

Thursday, November 3, 2011

Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W.Va., questions panel members on Capitol Hill in Washington, Thursday, May 20, 2010, during the Senate Health and Human Services subcommittee hearing on mine safety. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)

This just in from the Department of Labor:

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs has successfully defended a recent amendment to the Black Lung Benefits Act contained in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 3rd Circuit held in “B & G Construction Co. v. Campbell and Director, Office of Workers’ Comp. Programs” that the amendment is constitutional and provides benefits to certain survivors of miners who were entitled to benefits at the time of their deaths.

“This ruling supports our administration of the Byrd amendments in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act,” said OWCP Acting Director Gary A. Steinberg. “We are committed to providing the benefits that claimants are entitled to under the law — benefits that so many workers and families depend on when black lung has taken away their health and livelihoods.”

The Black Lung Benefits Act provides compensation to miners totally disabled by pneumoconiosis, commonly called black lung disease, and their eligible survivors. From 1982 until the PPACA amendment was enacted on March 23, 2010, a survivor, usually the miner’s spouse, had to prove that pneumoconiosis caused the miner’s death to be entitled to benefits, even if the miner was receiving benefits when he died. But the 3rd Circuit held that the PPACA amendment automatically continues benefits to a miner’s eligible survivors if the miner was entitled to benefits prior to death. The court rejected B & G’s contention that the amendment is unconstitutional under the due process and takings clauses of the Fifth Amendment.

The amendment applies to claims filed after Jan. 1, 2005, that were pending on or after March 23, 2010. In this case, the deceased miner had worked for B & G for more than 16 years. Because the miner was totally disabled due to pneumoconiosis, he received disability benefits until his death in 2005. Under the PPACA amendment, the court ruled that his surviving spouse is automatically entitled to continuing benefits.

(more…)

McAteer report: UBB black lung findings ‘alarming’

Friday, May 20, 2011

The report from Davitt McAteer’s independent investigation team contained some surprise findings that got only brief mentions in some of the media reports, but are worth much more attention than that.

It turns out that most of the miners killed in that terrible explosion on April 5, 2010, had black lung disease, or Coal workers’ pneumoconiosis (CWP). As the report explains:

At our request a recognized expert in occupational diseases and with experience in lung examinations of this sort reviewed the autopsy reports and determined the presence or absence of CWP.

Of the 29 victims, five did not have sufficient lung tissue available to make a determination relating to CWP: two due to massive injury and three due to autolysis. The remaining 24 victims had sufficient tissue for examination.

Seventeen of the 24 victims’ autopsies (or 71 percent) had CWP. This compares with the national prevalence rate for CWP among active underground miners in the U.S. is 3.2 percent, and the rate in West Virginia is 7.6 percent. The ages of the UBB victims with CWP ranged from 25 to 61 years.

The report concluded:

The victims at UBB constitute a random sample of miners. The fact that 71 percent of them show evidence of CWP is an alarming finding given the ages and work history of these men.

(more…)

MSHA extends comment period on dust rule

Monday, May 2, 2011

This just in from MSHA:

ARLINGTON, Va. – The U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration today announced that it has extended the comment period on the proposed rule “Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors.” In response to requests from interested parties, the comment period, which originally was to end May 2, has been extended until May 31.

“Our goal to end black lung is a long-standing one and was one of the commitments I made when I came to MSHA,” said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. “Not surprisingly, there has been an overwhelming response to this proposed rule. The additional time hopefully will give everyone who wants to comment the opportunity to do so.”

All comments must be received or postmarked by midnight EDT on May 31. They must be marked “RIN 1219-AB64” and may be sent to MSHA electronically through http://www.regulations.gov; by fax to 202-693-9441; by mail to MSHA, Office of Standards, Regulations and Variances, 1100 Wilson Blvd., Room 2350, Arlington, VA 22209-3939; or hand delivered to the same address. For hand delivery, sign in at the receptionist’s desk on the 21st floor.


New study adds to evidence about the need for tougher rules to end black lung disease

Friday, April 8, 2011

Kentucky Sen. Rand Paul has gotten a bit of attention lately for his statements that there’s no need for tougher federal coal-dust regulations because, the good senator claims, the coal industry has already done “a pretty good job” of reducing the incidence of black lung.

But a soon-to-be published study by researchers at West Virginia University shows how wrong Sen. Paul is. The study, due out soon in the peer-reviewed journal Chest, concludes:

Contemporary occupational dust exposures have resulted over the last decade in rapidly progressive pneumoconiosis and massive fibrosis in relatively young West Virginia coal miners, leading to important lung dysfunction and premature death.

Translation? Coal miners who are working in dust levels that are currently legal in this country are contracting and dying from serious lung diseases caused by their exposure to those legal levels of coal dust.

Longtime black lung doctor Edward L. Petsonk discussed his latest study (which he authored with W. Alex Wade and others) yesterday at the Wheeling Jesuit University 4th Annual International Mining Health and Safety Symposium here in Charleston.

According to the publicly available abstract, and Dr. Petsonk’s presentation yesterday, the study looked at 138 miners with progressive massive fibrosis whose claimed were approved by the West Virginia State Occupational Pneumoconiosis Board between January 2000 and December 2009. Researchers found:

Progressive massive fibrosis (PMF), a complication of CWP, developed in 138 West Virginia coal miners at a mean age of 52.6 years after an average of 30 years work tenure. The time of progression averaged 12.2 years from the last normal chest film until PMF was detected.

Lung function declined sharply in both smokers and nonsmokers … The Board has confirmed 21 deaths in this group. The most common job activities were operating continuous mining machines (41%) and roof bolting (19%). Virtually all of these miners’ dust exposures occurred after the implementation of current Federal dust regulations.

As we’ve reported before, Dr. Petsonk is among the public health professionals who have supported the Obama administration’s effort to end black lung disease, which is on the rise after years of decline following passage of the 1969 law.

After discussing his new study, he reminded those of us attending the Wheeling Jesuit Symposium that black lung hasn’t gone away:

It’s still happening. There is a problem with miners’ health, and it is a current problem. This is no longer something that we can just sit on our hands about.


‘End Black Lung’ update: MSHA still has no timeline for final rule to tighten coal-dust limits

Thursday, January 6, 2011

Yesterday morning, MSHA chief Joe Main was on the phone with news reporters, touting his agency’s ambitious and aggressive new regulatory agenda.

The event was part of a broader public relations effort by the Obama administration’s Department of Labor, with Web chats and telephone conference calls about the agency’s regulatory initiatives. As former MSHA and OSHA staffer Celeste Monforton has written on The Pump Handle blog:

… These plans quickly become stale because target dates are missed, new issues emerge and political winds shift, but they still give us a snapshot inside the agencies and the Administration’s regulatory strategies at a moment in time.

With that in mind, it’s particularly interesting to look at the MSHA regulatory agenda’s entry regarding what arguably is the most important mine safety and health issue facing the nation’s coalfields: The rule titled, Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors.

MSHA proposed the rule back in October, already nearly a year after officially kicking off its “End Black Lung: Act Now!” program. Remember that black lung has killed roughly 10,000 miners in the last decade, and public health advocates — including NIOSH and a Labor Department advisory panel — were advocating a tightening of the dust standard back in the mid-1990s. And, of course, the Obama administration went through months of a song-and-dance over whether they would actually follow those long-standing recommendations when they finally proposed their rule.

So now, with public hearings scheduled this month and next, what’s MSHA’s new regulatory agenda say about its next steps toward getting this rule finalized?

Post hearing comment period end: 2/28/2011

That’s it. No deadline for when the agency plans to issue a final rule.

So during a conference call with Joe Main and his regulatory chief, Patricia Silvey, I asked about that …

Pat Silvey kindly explained that this was MSHA’s semi-annual regulatory agenda. It’s a six-month-out look at what the agency has planned, she said, adding:

That’s what we’re here to talk about … we do not project further than that … we cannot project any further than that at this time.

OK. Well, if that’s the case, then it’s obvious I guess that MSHA doesn’t plan to finalize the coal-dust limits anytime in the next six months.

But when I looked at other items on MSHA’s agenda, agency officials in fact did project out beyond that six-month time frame. For example, the regulatory proposal concerning metal and nonmetal dams projects that MSHA will finish analyzing public comments in September 2011. Or, an item concerning approval of electrical products for use in mines is listed as having a proposed rule scheduled for publication in August 2012.

And in fact, the Federal Register notice outlining what Department of Labor agencies are supposed to include in their regulatory agendas says this:

Executive Order 12866 requires the semiannual publication of an agenda of regulations that contains a listing of all the regulations the Department of Labor expects to have under active consideration for promulgation, proposal, or review during the coming one-year period.

So, I’m not really sure what Pat Silvey and Joe Main were getting at with this thing about only projecting out six months in MSHA’s regulatory agenda. I asked the agency for a more complete explanation, but I haven’t heard anything back yet.

I would like to know — and coal miners would probably like to know — when MSHA expects to put in place the tougher coal-dust limits that experts say are needed to protect workers from this deadly disease.

Industry pans Obama plan to end black lung

Tuesday, December 7, 2010

Today is the first public hearing on the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration’s proposal to tighten the legal limit on coal dust as part of the Obama administration’s plan to end black lung disease.

Here’s the early report from the AP, whose Tim Huber attended the hearing held at the MSHA Academy outside Beckley:

The West Virginia Coal Association wants federal regulators to rewrite proposed regulations that would place stricter limits on coal dust exposure.

Lobbyist Chris Hamilton told a regulatory panel Tuesday the changes would cost far more than expected and are based on unproven science, among other things.

Others addressing the Mine Safety and Health Administration panel urged adoption of the changes as a step toward eradicating black lung disease, which is caused by inhaling dust.

The hearing at MSHA’s mine academy in Beaver is the first of seven planned across the country.

The proposal would cut by half existing limits for breathable dust in coal mines, among other things. The disease has plagued miners for generations and is blamed for more than 10,000 deaths in the past decade.

Recall that government agencies and advisory panels have been advocating a tighter dust standard for years, the MSHA proposal has the “full support” of the United Mine Workers union, and has been widely praised by worker health advocates and black lung experts.

MSHA adds Kentucky hearing on dust rules

Wednesday, December 1, 2010

The Obama administration has added another public hearing on the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration’s plan to “end black lung disease.”

In a Federal Register notice yesterday, MSHA published this list of public hearings:

– Dec. 7, 2010 National Mine Health and Safety Academy Beaver, W.Va.

– Jan. 11, 2011 Marriott Evansville Airport Evansville, Ind.

– Jan. 13, 2011 Sheraton Birmingham Birmingham, Ala.

– Jan. 25, 2011 Marriott Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, Utah

–  Feb. 8, 2011 The George Washington Hotel Washington, Pa.

–  Feb. 10, 2011 Jenny Wiley State Resort Park Prestonsburg, Ky.

–  Feb. 15, 2011 MSHA Headquarters Arlington, Va.

MSHA has added the hearing in Prestonsburg, Ky., apparently in response to concerns that the agency did not originally slot a hearing for Eastern Kentucky, where black lung is on the rise again.

The new schedule also changes the dates of hearings in Arlington, Va., and Washington, Pa.

Coal industry lawyer at Jackson Kelly suspended for hiding evidence in black lung benefits case

Thursday, November 18, 2010

The Gazette’s Andrew Clevenger has the story today on the West Virginia Supreme Court’s ruling to suspend for one year the law license of a Jackson Kelly coal industry attorney who withheld part of a medical report from a disabled coal miner who was seeking black lung benefits.

As Andrew explains:

...Justices unanimously concluded that Douglas A. Smoot violated the rules of professional conduct for lawyers by removing the “narrative summary” portion of a doctor’s report before turning it over to Elmer Daugherty, a retired miner who spent 42 years underground and who was representing himself at the time.

“[I]nsofar as we have found that the withheld portion of the report had evidentiary value, we have little difficulty concluding that Mr. Smoot’s conduct was deceitful, dishonest, a misrepresentation, and prejudicial to the administration of justice, and thus amounted to a violation,” Chief Justice Robin Davis wrote for a unanimous court.

See previous posts on this and related cases here and here, and read the full Supreme Court opinion here.

MSHA considering more black lung hearings

Tuesday, November 16, 2010

The Labor Department’s Mine Safety and Health Administration has a big public hearing coming up Thursday here in Charleston, where the mining community will get its say about MSHA’s proposal to tighten the rules for “rock dusting” underground coal mines to help prevent deadly explosions.

That hearing is scheduled to start at 9 a.m. at the Charleston Marriott.

Meanwhile, MSHA has announced plans for six public hearings on its proposed plan to tighten the coal-dust exposure limit to try to end black lung disease. Here’s that list of hearing locations:

Dec. 7, 2010 National Mine Health and Safety Academy Beaver, W.Va.

Dec. 9, 2010 The George Washington Hotel Washington, Pa.

Jan. 11, 2011 Marriott Evansville Airport Evansville, Ind.

Jan. 13, 2011 Sheraton Birmingham Birmingham, Ala.

Jan. 25, 2011 Marriott Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, Utah

Jan. 27, 2011 Mine Safety and Health Administration Headquarters Arlington, Va.

As several Coal Tattoo readers have pointed out, missing from that list is anywhere in Eastern Kentucky or Southwestern Virginia, a pocket of the coalfields where researchers have found an alarming resurgence of black lung.

The closest spot where miners from those areas could come and speak to MSHA about its plan?  Beaver, W.Va., where MSHA has its national training center … That’s a pretty long haul from someplace like Pike County, Ky.

I asked MSHA spokeswoman Amy Louviere about this, and she said the agency is considering scheduling an additional hearing, but that the location has not been determined.


MSHA announces public hearings on Obama administration’s plan to “end black lung” disease

Wednesday, November 10, 2010

This just in:

The U.S. Department of Labor’s Mine Safety and Health Administration today announced that it will hold six public hearings on the proposed rule “Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust, Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors.” The notice will be available in the Federal Register on Nov. 15. The proposed rule was published Oct. 19 and is available here.

“This proposed rule would significantly improve health protections for underground and surface coal miners by reducing their occupational exposure to respirable coal mine dust,” said Joseph A. Main, assistant secretary of labor for mine safety and health. “It will lower the risk that they will suffer material impairment of health or functional capacity over their working lives.”

Each of the public hearings will begin at 9 a.m. local time and end after the last presenter speaks, but no later than 5 p.m., on the following dates at the locations indicated:

Dec. 7, 2010 National Mine Health and Safety Academy Beaver, W.Va.

Dec. 9, 2010 The George Washington Hotel Washington, Pa.

Jan. 11, 2011 Marriott Evansville Airport Evansville, Ind.

Jan. 13, 2011 Sheraton Birmingham Birmingham, Ala.

Jan. 25, 2011 Marriott Salt Lake City Salt Lake City, Utah

Jan. 27, 2011 Mine Safety and Health Administration Headquarters Arlington, Va.

Each hearing will begin with an opening statement from MSHA, followed by an opportunity for members of the public to make oral presentations. A written request is not required to speak; however, individuals and representatives of organizations wishing to speak are encouraged to notify MSHA in advance for scheduling purposes by calling 202-693-9440.

MSHA will accept post-hearing written comments and other appropriate information for the record from any interested party, including those not presenting oral statements. Comments must be received by midnight EST on Feb. 28, 2011.

Praise for Obama’s plan to end black lung

Monday, October 18, 2010

House Labor Committee Chairman George Miller, D-Calif., issued this statement in support of the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration’s proposed plan to end black lung disease:

After years of careful study and delays, I applaud Assistant Secretary Joe Main and Secretary Solis’ effort to seriously address the scourge of black lung disease among our nation’s coal miners. The large number of miners still getting sick every year proves that current protections are woefully out of date. When fully phased in over the next two years, these new standards will not only save lives and provide for better monitoring technology of coal dust, but they will reduce the cost of federal disability program for black lung because fewer miners will be contracting this debilitating disease.

(more…)

W.Va. Senate candidates focus on “war on coal,” but what about war on coal miner health and safety?

Friday, October 15, 2010

There’s obviously been a lot of talk during the campaign to fill Robert C. Byrd’s U.S. Senate seat about the Obama administration’s alleged “war on coal,” with Democrat and Gov. Joe Manchin trying to fend off the rather absurd suggestion by Republican John Raese that the governor doesn’t strongly support the industry.

Except for a minor blip here and there — mostly in the form of the Manchin campaign ad criticizing Raese-owned companies’ safety records, which somebody in the Manchin camp decided should be filmed at a mine that’s under federal criminal investigation for faking safety inspections — there’s been little talk about mine safety and health.

But the general thrust from both campaigns has been that Manchin and Raese both are strong supporters of coal miners, defenders of their jobs and their “way of life” against those nasty federal regulators. Almost unbelievably, Manchin took this even farther than Raese did, not only suing the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency for trying to protect the environment, but also trying to show voters he’s man enough to take his gun to a defenseless piece of federal legislation.

So if Gov. Manchin and Mr. Raese are such big supporters of coal miners, you would think they would be all about helping to put an end to black lung, a disease that has killed 10,000 coal miners in the last decade alone — including more than 1,800 in West Virginia.

And yes, what positions the candidates would take on an issue like this could be critically important … Republicans currently have mine safety legislation bottled up in the U.S. Senate, and MSHA’s ability to enact and enforce tougher dust limits could be hampered or enhanced by better funding and oversight, depending on who is speaking for miners from West Virginia’s other Senate seat. Don’t forget — the last time the nation had a Democratic president and a reformer (Davitt McAteer) running MSHA,  the GOP took over Congress in the midterm elections and proceeded to try to dismantle federal mine safety protections altogether.

While Gov. Manchin moved swiftly following the Sago and Aracoma deaths to enact new state mine rescue legislation for West Virginia, the administration here hasn’t followed through yet on increased coal-dust sampling or proposed any legislation at all in the wake of the Upper Big Branch Disaster.

And Mr. Raese? Well, he hasn’t really made improving mine safety a part of his campaign and it’s pretty clear the guy doesn’t care for federal regulation of such things.

But still, shouldn’t voters know whether either candidate would support or oppose MSHA’s new effort to eliminate black lung. Perhaps foolishly, I thought so … so I asked yesterday for comments from both campaigns about the MSHA plan.

First, I haven’t heard a word back from the Raese campaign, though I continue to get their regular e-mail blasts that they send our regularly to all of the media.

But folks at the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee should hold off trying to make much of that, because this is the best Gov. Manchin’s campaign could do in commenting on the MSHA plan to end black lung:

It may be challenging to meet this new rule, but everyone wants safe work and health conditions, and we must seek consistent improvements in regards to enhancing our workplace safety. It is my understanding that there is a 60-day comment period and all affected parties will be able to voice their views or concerns at this time.


MSHA chief Joe Main: Tougher rules to end black lung are “the right thing to do” for coal miners

Thursday, October 14, 2010

Labor Secretary Hilda Solis and MSHA chief Joe Main a little while ago wrapped up a brief conference call with the media, in which they formally announced their new rulemaking that is part of the Obama administration’s “End Black Lung” campaign.

Here are the highlights of  the proposed rule:

– Phasing in, over a two-year period, a tightening of the legal limit for coal dust from 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter to 1.0 milligrams per cubic meter.

– Require the use of continuous personal dust monitors to measure miners’ exposure in a more timely and accurate manner.

– Provide for full-shift sampling — rather than averaging samples from multiple shifts, which can underestimate actual numbers — to more accurately measure miners’ exposure.

– Redefine work shifts for compliance purposes to more accurately reflect that miners simply don’t always work eight-hour shifts anymore.

In today’s news release, MSHA noted:

Based on recent data from NIOSH, cases of black lung are increasing among the nation’s coal miners. Even younger miners are showing evidence of advanced and debilitating lung disease from excessive dust exposure. Over the past decade, more than 10,000 miners have died from black lung. The federal government has paid out more than $44 billion in compensation for miners totally disabled by black lung since 1970, according to the Labor Department’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs.

(more…)

Obama MSHA proposes phase-in of tighter standard on coal dust that causes deadly black lung disease

Thursday, October 14, 2010

The Obama administration appears to be proposing a two-year phase-in of a long-recommended tighter legal limit for coal dust that causes deadly black lung disease.

Copies of the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration proposal are available now through the Federal Register the Department of Labor Web site here,  in advance of a news conference scheduled by MSHA chief Joe Main and Labor Secretary Hilda Solis later today.

According to the proposal, the legal limit on coal dust in underground mines — currently 2.0 milligrams per cubic meter of air — would be tightened to 1.7 milligrams six months after the rule is finalized. The limit would be tightened to 1.5 milligrams in a year and then to 1.0 milligrams a year after that.

MSHA says in the proposal:

MSHA is proposing a 24-month phase-in period to allow the mining community the opportunity to identify, develop and implement feasible engineering controls; train miners and mine management in new technology and control measures; and to improve their overall dust control program.

According to MSHA:

The proposed rule would significantly improve health protections for this Nation’s coal miners by reducing their occupational exposure to respirable coal mine dust and lowering the risk that they will suffer material impairment of health or functional capacity over their working lives.

Check back … we’ll have more on this later today.

UPDATED: For a quick commentary on this, see The Pump Handle, where Celeste Monforton calls the Obama proposal a “bold step.”

Will Obama administration ‘end black lung’?

Thursday, October 14, 2010

President Obama’s top worker safety regulators have scheduled a press conference call today to discuss their plan to end black lung disease.

Will their proposals really get the job done?

Well, The Hill lays out again what Coal Tattoo has been saying (see previous posts here, here, here and here)  is the key to answering that question:

The big question about Thursday’s announcement: Will the agency propose to reduce workers’ permissible exposure limit (PEL) to coal dust? Or will it simply take steps to limit miners’ exposure to the dust?

The Hill explains:

The difference is nuanced but significant.

The mining industry has argued the current PEL — which, since 1974, has been set at 2 milligrams of dust per cubic meter of air over an eight-hour shift — is appropriate, but just not very well enforced. In their version of the tale, any occurrence of black lung is the result of companies simply not complying with the current limits.

Many health and mine-safety experts, however, tell a different story. They say the current PEL is too high and doesn’t go far enough to protect the nation’s miners. If the Labor Department simply takes steps to enforce the PEL without lowering it, they warn, black lung will remain an enormous problem.

“Even if every single company were complying with the standard, you would still have the disease,” Celeste Monforton, a former mine-safety official in the Labor Department who’s now a public health professor at George Washington University, said Wednesday. “The science tells us that 2 [mg/m3] is not protective.”

Remember, the Obama administration initially issued a regulatory notice saying it planned to tighten the dust limit, but later — after Joe Main took over at MSHA — the announced plan was changed, to one that did not specifically include tightening the limit.

Stay tuned …

Black lung disease: Let’s review

Wednesday, October 13, 2010

With the Obama administration set to release its plan to “End Black Lung” on Thursday, perhaps it’s worth reviewing some of what the science tells us about black lung and how to prevent it …

Luckily, the folks at the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health recently published a summary of scientific findings about black lung since 1995. It’s available online here, and NIOSH describes it this way:

In 1995 in a major NIOSH review and report of recommendations, entitled Criteria for a Recommended Standard – Occupational Exposure to Respirable Coal Mine Dust. This Current Intelligence Bulletin updates the information on coal mine dust exposures and associated health effects from 1995 to the present. In part, the intent is to determine whether the 1995 recommendations, in this respect, remain valid, and to what extent, if any, modifications or additions are needed to those recommendations. The report does not deal with, nor discuss, issues of sampling and analytical feasibility nor technical feasibility in achieving compliance.

Of course, that 1995 NIOSH report — available here — clearly recommended that MSHA tighten the allowable limit of coal dust in underground mines from 2 milligrams per cubic meter to 1 milligram per cubic meter.

So what does the new NIOSH report say? Well, how about these comments:

– While findings published since 1995 refine or add further to the understanding of the respiratory health effects of coal mine dust described in the NIOSH Criteria … they do not contradict or critically modify the primary conclusions and associated recommendations given there. Rather, the new findings strengthen those conclusions and recommendations.

Even at the lower coal mine dust levels recommended by NIOSH … some incidence of [black lung] would still be expected, especially among miners of higher rank coal.

– … Even at the 1 mg/m3 coal mine dust exposure limit recommended by the CCD, some occupational effect on ventilatory function is expected.

(more…)

MSHA tries to drum up support for black lung plan

Tuesday, October 12, 2010

With an announcement of the Obama administration actual plan to “End Black Lung” expected very soon, the U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration is trying to drum up support for the proposal — before interested parties have even had a chance to see it.

UPDATED: Labor Secretary Hilda Solis has scheduled a press conference for Thursday to announce the administration’s plan.

Potential supporters have received this note from MSHA officials:

Hello folks,

Thank so much for your continuing offer to help MSHA with our End Black Lung campaign and rulemaking efforts. Sorry if I missed speaking with you – I left you a message with my contact information.

As promised, attached is the excerpt from our spring regulatory agenda on “Lowering Miners’ Exposure to Coal Mine Dust Including Continuous Personal Dust Monitors” for a bit of background on the direction of our respirable dust proposed rule.

To assist us, we appreciate if you could provide:

1) a quote of endorsement via email first (by Tuesday noon??)

2) followed by a letter (if you care to send in a formal statement). If possible, we would like this letter by COB Tuesday, October 12, 2010 (scanned and sent via email to me). The letter should be addressed to:

Mr. Joseph A. Main

Assistant Secretary of Labor

Mine Safety and Health Administration

1100 Wilson Boulevard

Arlington, VA 22209-3939

3) press availability. If yes, I will provide your contact information to Amy Louviere, our public affairs director, and she may line up media interviews with local media outlets or provide your contact info to the journalist(s) for general comments.

(more…)