Federal No. 2: Model mine under federal scrutiny

February 23, 2010 by Ken Ward Jr.

solisfederal2

Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, right,  during a visit to Patriot Coal’s Federal No. 2 Mine in northern West Virginia in August 2009.

We had an exclusive story in today’s Gazette print edition and online about major safety concerns at Patriot Coal’s Federal No. 2 Mine up outside of Morgantown.

Federal prosecutors are actively investigating whether mine managers there falsified safety records to cover up explosive levels of methane in sealed areas of the underground operation.

This revelation is a bit inconvenient for Labor Secretary Hilda Solis, who visited the mine last year and touted its fine safety record, and for MSHA chief Joe Main, because this is a United Mine Workers operation that is frequently held up as an example of the best the coal industry has to offer.

At the time of the Solis visit, Tim Huber of The Associated Press wrote:

Patriot’s Federal No. 2 is regarded by labor, industry and regulators as a well-run, safe operation. Like other West Virginia underground mines, it already has added airtight emergency shelters, caches of oxygen and other improvements required by the state after a pair of high-profile accidents killed 14 miners in January 2006.

But Coal Tattoo readers were given this information:

Indeed, Federal No. 2 has for many years had a strong safety record. The mine lists no deaths going back to at least 1995. Its non-fatal injury rate has been better than the national average in 12 of the last 14 years, according to U.S. Mine Safety and Health Administration records.

But the most recent quarterly results available on MSHA’s Web site — for the period from January through March 2009 — show a non-fatal injury rate that is more than twice the national average. That rate includes 20 injuries during the first quarter of the year. And other MSHA data includes a list of 10 more injuries in the second quarter — meaning more miners have been hurt at this operation during the first half of 2009 that were typically hurt in a full year going back more than a decade.

Coal Tattoo also reported:

Mine safety and health violations at Federal No. 2 are also on the rise, according to MSHA data.

For the decade 1995 through 2004, the operation averaged a violation rate of 37 violations for every 200,000 hours worked. Since then, Federal No. 2 has averaged 65 violations per 200,000 hours worked.

And how about this idea that Federal No. 2 was way ahead of the curve in improving its emergency equipment and practices in response to the Sago Mine disaster?

In addition:

And how about this idea that Federal No. 2 was way ahead of the curve in improving its emergency equipment and practices in response to the Sago Mine disaster?

Well, I took a look at the most recent quarterly inspection by MSHA. It began on July 1 and is ongoing. So far, MSHA inspectors have issued 27 citations.

Those citations included two violations of rules governing mine escape tunnelsfirefighting equipment, one violation of MSHA rules governing sprinklers,  and two violations of rules governing escapeway maps. (including not having required “lifelines” to lead miners to the emergency breathing device caches — a new requirement post-Sago), one violation of rules governing

Not for nothing, but the mine’s previous quarterly inspection, from April through June, also prompted two citations for violations of firefighting equipment rules and one for a violation of communications equipment rules.

I wondered in this blog whether Solis or Main asked UMWA workers at Federal No. 2 about this troubling statistics … we didn’t find out, because the Labor Department closed to visit — except for a press conference — to all reporters except one from the Wall Street Journal, who didn’t address these issues in her coverage.

West Virginia mine safety officials, including director Ron Wooten, were very open yesterday about the situation at Federal No. 2, perhaps at least in part because the federal criminal probe essentially halted any state investigation into the matter.

I’ve asked for an interview with Joe Main to ask him what’s going on now at Federal No. 2.  So far, MSHA has said Main won’t talk … I guess we’ll find out how much MSHA is on board with the Obama administration’s professed interest in open government and transparency.



9 Responses to “Federal No. 2: Model mine under federal scrutiny”

  1. Axvitt says:

    Is that Cecil Roberts from the UMWA to the left in the photo?

  2. Ken Ward Jr. says:

    Good catch, Axvitt. Though the DOL site with the photos, http://www.dol.gov/dol/media/photos/slideshows/20090804-mine.htm did not identify him, I think you may be right. Ken.

  3. L Patrick says:

    No. That is not Cecil Roberts.

  4. Axvitt says:

    Afraid you are mistaken, L Patrick. Click on the link provided by Mr. Ward & you can see other pics where Mr. Roberts is clearly identifiable – from there it is easier to identify Mr. Roberts as the gentleman in the attached pic.

  5. Phil Smith says:

    Yes, that is President Roberts in that photo. He accompanied Sec. Solis underground that day.

  6. Ken Ward Jr. says:

    OK, folks … Phil Smith is the UMWA’s communications director, so I think he puts an end to that debate.

    Interesting that’s all Coal Tattoo readers had to say about what seemed to me to be a pretty serious situation up at Federal No. 2.

  7. [...] up on Monday’s big story about the growing scandal over falsification of  key safety records at Patriot Coal’s Federal No. 2 Mine in north-central Wes…, mine foreman John Renner has been charged by federal [...]

  8. [...] now that Federal No. 2 is the subject of a broad criminal investigation targeting management officials who allegedly falsified safety records, Secretary Solis [...]

  9. [...] are some of the other names on the list: Patriot Coal for operations including its unionized Federal No. 2 Mine, which has already been targeted with a federal criminal probe, and at least five mines that I [...]

Leave a Reply