<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Coal and climate news for June 29, 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/</link>
	<description>Just another The other blogs! weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 14:52:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Rodd</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-16206</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Rodd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:13:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/#comment-16206</guid>
		<description>The researcher Vaclav Smil makes the point that if people in the United States reduced their per capita energy use to that of people in Western Europe, that reduction alone would stop the growth of global atmospheric carbon emissions, and get us on the right path to safety.

Yes, energy is more expensive in those countries, which is a big reason why they have gotten so good at conserving it.  And yes, their cities are closer together, etc.

I remember visiting Holland 25 years ago, and even back then they heated water with electricity at night, because the rates were cheaper.

I think that higher energy prices -- somewhat -- and lots of conservation and efficiency -- are clearly the direction the US is heading.

No, it&#039;s not going to be easy.  But to save the future of this planet for our grandchildren, it&#039;s not so bad of a direction.

After all, Europeans invented pizza!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The researcher Vaclav Smil makes the point that if people in the United States reduced their per capita energy use to that of people in Western Europe, that reduction alone would stop the growth of global atmospheric carbon emissions, and get us on the right path to safety.</p>
<p>Yes, energy is more expensive in those countries, which is a big reason why they have gotten so good at conserving it.  And yes, their cities are closer together, etc.</p>
<p>I remember visiting Holland 25 years ago, and even back then they heated water with electricity at night, because the rates were cheaper.</p>
<p>I think that higher energy prices &#8212; somewhat &#8212; and lots of conservation and efficiency &#8212; are clearly the direction the US is heading.</p>
<p>No, it&#8217;s not going to be easy.  But to save the future of this planet for our grandchildren, it&#8217;s not so bad of a direction.</p>
<p>After all, Europeans invented pizza!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rmoen</title>
		<link>http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-16205</link>
		<dc:creator>Rmoen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 18:26:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.wvgazette.com/coaltattoo/2009/06/29/coal-and-climate-news-for-june-29-2009/#comment-16205</guid>
		<description>As a nation we need clean, cheap energy -- not clean, expensive energy. I am a Democrat and think Congress is overplaying its hand.  I fear cap and trade legislation will double our cost of energy over the years -- even faster for gasoline.  Plus, unintended consequences will abound. The bill is too complicated, with too many moving parts.  Why?  There are 880 lobbyists registered to lobby on climate change and their fingerprints are all over the bill.

Cap and trade will enrich a new class of financial speculator at a cost of billions of dollars to American consumers.  It will also drive-out manufacturing of every description.  Even non-polluting Microsoft says it will move jobs overseas because cap and trade &quot;makes U.S. jobs more expensive.&quot;  Cap and trade is worse than a tax because only 15% of the proceeds from auctioned permits go into our national treasury.

And the kicker?  We&#039;ll never even know if cap and trade ever worked.

If instead the United States had a national mandate to replace coal generation plants with natural gas and nuclear energy, plus if we replaced our commuter cars with battery-powered electric cars, we would drastically reduce our dependence on foreign oil and reduce CO2 emissions faster and beyond the proposed cap and trade targets.

-- Robert Moen, www.energyplanUSA.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a nation we need clean, cheap energy &#8212; not clean, expensive energy. I am a Democrat and think Congress is overplaying its hand.  I fear cap and trade legislation will double our cost of energy over the years &#8212; even faster for gasoline.  Plus, unintended consequences will abound. The bill is too complicated, with too many moving parts.  Why?  There are 880 lobbyists registered to lobby on climate change and their fingerprints are all over the bill.</p>
<p>Cap and trade will enrich a new class of financial speculator at a cost of billions of dollars to American consumers.  It will also drive-out manufacturing of every description.  Even non-polluting Microsoft says it will move jobs overseas because cap and trade &#8220;makes U.S. jobs more expensive.&#8221;  Cap and trade is worse than a tax because only 15% of the proceeds from auctioned permits go into our national treasury.</p>
<p>And the kicker?  We&#8217;ll never even know if cap and trade ever worked.</p>
<p>If instead the United States had a national mandate to replace coal generation plants with natural gas and nuclear energy, plus if we replaced our commuter cars with battery-powered electric cars, we would drastically reduce our dependence on foreign oil and reduce CO2 emissions faster and beyond the proposed cap and trade targets.</p>
<p>&#8211; Robert Moen, <a href="http://www.energyplanUSA.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.energyplanUSA.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

